United States v. James H. Britton

Decision Date02 April 1883
Docket Number410
Citation108 U.S. 207,2 S. Ct. 536
Parties<P><B><CENTER> UNITED STATES</CENTER></B></P> <P><B><CENTER>v.</CENTER></B></P> <P><B><CENTER>JAMES H. BRITTON AND BARTON BATES.</CENTER></B></P>
CourtTexas Court of Appeals
108 U.S. 207

2 S.Ct. 536

UNITED STATES

v.

JAMES H. BRITTON AND BARTON BATES.

No. 410.

Argued October 1882, Decided April 1883.

In case No. 410, (UNITED STATES v. JAMES H. BRITTON and

BARTON BATES,) on certificate of division in opinion from the same

court, the indictment contained five counts, all substantially

similar to the counts in case 409, [ante, 531,] just disposed of.

What we have said in reference to the indictment in case 409

applies to the indictment in this case. As the indictment is bad,

and no good indictment can be framed upon the facts as they appear

therein, it is unnecessary and we decline to answer the specific

questions submitted to us by the judges of the circuit court. U.

S.

v. Buzzo, 18 Wall. 125.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Merriam v. United States
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • 9 d1 Abril d1 1883
  • UNITED STATES V. BRITTON
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • 2 d1 Abril d1 1883
    ... ... As the answer we have given to this question is fatal to the indictment, it is not necessary for us to answer the other questions sent to us by the judges of the circuit court ... Answer accordingly ... In case No. 410, United States v. James H. Britton and Barton Bates, on certificate of division in opinion from the same court, the indictment contained five counts, all substantially similar to the counts in case 409, just disposed of. What we have said in reference to the indictment in case 409 applies to the indictment in this case ... ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT