United States v. Jones
| Decision Date | 01 May 1893 |
| Docket Number | No. 262,262 |
| Citation | 13 S.Ct. 840,149 U.S. 262,37 L.Ed. 726 |
| Parties | UNITED STATES v. JONES et al |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Asst. Atty. Gen. Parker, for the United States.
T. Alexander and N. C. Blanchard, for defendants in error.
Judgment was rendered in this case July 18, the writ of error sued out and allowed July 23, and the court adjourned for the term July 30, 1889. So far as disclosed by the record, the bill of exceptions was not tendered to the judge, or signed by him, until October 7, 1889, and no order was entered extending the time for its presentation, nor was there any consent of parties thereto, nor any standing rule of court which authorized such approval. The bill of exceptions was therefore improvidently allowed. Muller v. Ehlers, 91 U. S. 249; Jones v. Sewing-Mach. Co., 131 U. S. Append. cl.; Bank v. Eldred, 143 U. S. 293, 12 Sup. Ct. Rep. 450. As the errors assigned arise upon the bill of exceptions, we are compelled to affirm the judgment; and it is so ordered.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Sims v. Douglass
...v. Eldred, 143 U.S. 293, 12 S.Ct. 450, 36 L.Ed. 162; Hume v. Bowie, 148 U.S. 245, 253, 13 S.Ct. 582, 37 L.Ed. 438; U. S. v. Jones, 149 U.S. 262, 13 S.Ct. 840, 37 L.Ed. 726; Morse v. Anderson, 150 U.S. 156, 14 S.Ct. 43, 37 L.Ed. 1037; Jennings v. Philadelphia, B. & W. R. Co., 218 U.S. 255, 3......
-
Wainer v. United States, 6035.
...v. Daniels (C.C.A.) 211 F. 57; Robertson v. Cockrell (C.C.A.) 209 F. 843; Miller v. Morgan (C. C.A.) 67 F. 82; United States v. Jones, 149 U.S. 262, 13 S.Ct. 840, 37 L.Ed. 726. In the rules the Supreme Court has substituted for the trial term a period of thirty days, and orders entered afte......
-
Southern Pac. Co. v. Johnson
...under very extraordinary circumstances. See cases cited supra; also, Bank v. Eldred, 143 U.S. 293, 12 Sup.Ct. 450; U.S. v. Jones, 149 U.S. 262, 13 Sup.Ct. 840; Morse v. Anderson, 150 U.S. 156, 14 Sup.Ct. Ward v. Cochran, 150 U.S. 597, 602, 14 Sup.Ct. 230; Railway Co. v. Russell, 9 C.C.A. 10......
-
Scaife v. Western North Carolina Land Co.
...87 F. 308 SCAIFE v. WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA LAND CO. et al. SAME v. PURNELL. No. 259.United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.May 3, 1898 ... M ... Silver and J. H ... on which the court will decide. Jones v. Buckell, ... 104 U.S. 554. The bill of exceptions must be prepared and ... settled during the ... ...