United States v. Koritan, Cr. No. 20019.

Decision Date29 March 1960
Docket NumberCr. No. 20019.
Citation182 F. Supp. 143
PartiesUNITED STATES of America v. Gilbert D. KORITAN a/k/a Gilbert Goldberg, Paul Lee Adams and Wallace Trusty.
CourtU.S. District Court — Eastern District of Pennsylvania

Walter E. Alessandroni, U. S. Atty., James P. Dornberger, Asst. U. S. Atty., Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiff.

George, Gershenfeld, Philadelphia, Pa., for defendant Wallace Trusty.

Nathan Berlant, Philadelphia, Pa., for defendant Paul Lee Adams.

CLARY, District Judge.

Gilbert D. Koritan (also known as Gilbert Goldberg), Paul Lee Adams and Wallace Trusty were indicted as of the above number, charged in Count I with conspiracy and in Counts II to VII inclusive with substantive offenses in connection with false statements made to the Veterans Administration for the purpose of securing an Insured Loan. Koritan pleaded guilty to two substantive counts of causing false statements to be submitted to the Veterans Administration in connection with the transaction involved, and pleaded not guilty to the conspiracy count and the remaining substantive counts.

The United States Attorney listed the case for trial only as to Paul Lee Adams and Wallace Trusty, both represented by the same counsel, George Gershenfeld, Esquire. When the case was called for trial, a jury trial was waived. The Court proceeded to hear the case. In the midst of the testimony by the final government witness, being number fifteen in its list of witnesses, Mr. Gershenfeld advised the Court that he could not properly continue since there was an evident conflict of interest between his clients. The Court granted the motion to terminate the trial after both defendants, on the record, waived any possible defense of double jeopardy and requested the Court to start anew.

At the request of the Court, Nathan Berlant, Esquire, who had previously appeared in the case for both defendants and had been allowed on petition to withdraw, agreed to represent Paul Lee Adams with the complete approval of Wallace Trusty, the second defendant.

The Court then proceeded again to hear the case and at the conclusion of the trial found Trusty guilty on Counts I, II, V and VI, and not guilty on Counts III, IV and VII. The Court found Paul Lee Adams not guilty on Counts I, III, IV, V, VI, and VII, and reserved decision as to count II.1

Wallace Trusty has now moved for a new trial, basing his motion primarily on two alleged errors. Agent Scoville of the Federal Bureau of Investigation when testifying about an interview with Trusty used a typewritten memorandum which he had dictated from rough notes on February 4, 1959, the day of the interview. These notes had been transcribed on February 16, 1959, returned to Agent Scoville, who checked them for their accuracy and then placed them in his file. The defendant argues that it was error for the Court to permit him to use them, citing United States v. Riccardi, 3 Cir., 1949, 174 F.2d 883. Since the holding in the Riccardi case does not support his theory and we are satisfied that their use under the circumstances was not improper, this objection will be dismissed.

The second important reason assigned is that Trusty cannot be found guilty of the crime of conspiracy, since Adams was acquitted on that Count and Koritan was not tried: particularly since the Government made no motion for a severance. A brief résumé of the facts is necessary to place this objection in proper focus. The facts adduced and as found by the Court are as follows: Koritan, who traded as Sun Realty Company, bought a house for $3,800. He attempted to find a G.I. interested in purchasing the property and in this regard talked to Trusty, a real estate salesman. Trusty produced Adams, an honorably discharged veteran. A certificate of valuation in the amount of $7,000 was secured from the Veterans Administration. The loan was to be processed by the Walnut Street Federal Savings & Loan Association. Koritan testified for the Government. He stated that when Trusty informed him Adams had no money for a down payment he agreed to waive the down payment and give Adams credit for a down payment of $550, which was never intended to be paid, although the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
11 cases
  • Com. v. Byrd
    • United States
    • Pennsylvania Supreme Court
    • August 15, 1980
    ...insufficient to afford a single convicted conspirator any relief. United States v. Koritan, 283 F.2d 516 (3rd Cir. 1960) aff'g 182 F.Supp. 143 (E.D.Pa.); United States v. Fox, 130 F.2d 56 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied, 317 U.S. 666, 63 S.Ct. 74, 87 L.Ed. 535 (1942); State v. Goldman, 95 N.J.Supe......
  • People v. Nunez
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • July 10, 1986
    ... ... (Romontio v. United States[183 Cal.App.3d 219] (10th Cir.1968) 400 ... F.2d 618; People ... Koritan, 182 F.Supp. 143, 145, affd. 283 F.2d 516.) The fact that Y is later ... ...
  • United States v. Cavell
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Pennsylvania
    • May 10, 1968
    ...19, 74 A.2d 506 (1950). Failure to formally move for severance constitutes a waiver of any future objection thereto. United States v. Koritan, 182 F.Supp. 143 (E.D.Pa. 1960); aff'd, 283 F.2d 516 (3rd Cir. C. Adverse Publicity. It is alleged that the fact that the District Attorney was campa......
  • People v. Superior Court (Jackson)
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • January 14, 1975
    ...of the first-tried co-conspirator has been allowed to stand. (United States v. Fox (3d Cir. 1942) 130 F.2d 56; United States v. Koritan (D.C.E.D.Pa.1960) 182 F.Supp. 143.) Similarly, the consistency rule has not been applied when one conspirator has plea guilty and subsequently, in a severe......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT