Universal Life Ins. Co. v. Howlett, 5--3820
| Decision Date | 14 March 1966 |
| Docket Number | No. 5--3820,5--3820 |
| Citation | 240 Ark. 458,400 S.W.2d 294 |
| Parties | UNIVERSAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. Elnora HOWLETT, Appellee. |
| Court | Arkansas Supreme Court |
E. V. Trimble, Little Rock, for appellant.
Reinberger, Eilbott, Smith & Staten, by Edward I. Staten, Pine Bluff, for appellee.
This is a suit brought by the appellee as the beneficiary of a $1,000 life insurance policy issued by the appellant upon the life of Lloyd Pierce, who died on August 25, 1964. The defendant filed a general denial, but it failed to file proper responses to the plaintiff's requests for admissions of fact. Upon this state of the record the trial court granted the plaintiff's motion for a summary judgment.
The court was right. In an action upon an insurance policy a general denial merely puts the plaintiff to his proof; an affirmative defense, such as an exception in the policy, must be specially pleaded. Stucker v. Hartford Acc. & Ind. Co., 220 Ark. 475, 248 S.W.2d 383 (952). Hence in the case at bar the defendant's general denial merely put in issue the allegations of the complaint.
The plaintiff's requests for admissions covered all the material facts alleged in the complaint. The defendant's only response consisted of unverified denials signed only by its attorney. Such a failure to comply with the statute admits the facts asserted in the request for admissions. Ark.Stat.Ann., § 28--358 (Repl.1962); Young v. Dodson, 239 Ark. 143, 388 S.W.2d 94 (1965); Brown v. Lewis, 231 Ark. 976, 334 S.W.2d 225 (1960). The complaint stated a cause of action. Inasmuch as there was no material fact left in dispute the court had no alternative to granting the motion for a summary judgment. Ark.Stat.Ann. § 29--211(c); Jones v. Comer, 237 Ark. 500, 374 S.W.2d 465 (1964).
Affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Ryder Truck Rental, Inc. v. Kramer
...pleadings and grants the summary judgment if the party is otherwise entitled thereto as a matter of law. Universal Life Ins. Co. v. Howlett, 240 Ark. 458, 400 S.W.2d 294; Jones v. Comer, 237 Ark. 500, 374 S.W.2d 465. In reviewing the record, the trial court must view it in the light most fa......
-
Hatchell v. Wren
...of fact is left to be determined. See Phoenix of Hartford v. Coney, 249 Ark. 447, 459 S.W.2d 558 (1970); Universal Life Ins. Co. v. Howlett, 240 Ark. 458, 400 S.W.2d 294 (1966). At the conclusion of the hearing below, the trial court made its ruling from the [T]here appears to be no dispute......
-
Phoenix of Hartford v. Coney
...judgment if no material issue of fact is left to be determined. Brown v. Lewis, 231 Ark. 976, 334 S.W.2d 225; Universal Life Ins. Co. v. Howlett, 240 Ark. 458, 400 S.W.2d 294; B. & P., Inc. v. Norment, 241 Ark. 1092, 411 S.W.2d 506; Delta Discount Company v. Fryer, 244 Ark. 489, 426 S.W.2d ......
-
Stocker v. Hall, 80-70
...admissions. We have adhered to this rule. Phoenix of Hartford v. Coney, 249 Ark. 447, 459 S.W.2d 558 (1970); Universal Life Ins. Co. v. Howlett, 240 Ark. 458, 400 S.W.2d 294 (1966); B. & P., Inc. v. Norment, 241 Ark. 1092, 411 S.W.2d 506 (1967). Here we hold the fact asserted in Request No.......