Universal Underwriters Ins. Co. v. A. J. King Lumber Co.

• Citation: 553 S.W.2d 749
• Court: Tennessee Supreme Court
• Decision Date: 25 July 1977
• Parties: UNIVERSAL UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE CO., Appellant, v. A. J. KING LUMBER COMPANY and James Sutton, Appellees.

Page 749

553 S.W.2d 749

UNIVERSAL UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE CO., Appellant, v. A. J. KING LUMBER COMPANY and James Sutton, Appellees.

Supreme Court of Tennessee.

July 25, 1977.

Hunter Smith, Davis, Norris, Treadway & Hadden, Kingsport, for appellant.

James F. Pryor, Knoxville, Tenn., for appellees.

OPINION

BROCK, Justice.

This is a workmen's compensation case. The Chancellor awarded benefits and the employer's insurer appeals.

Appellant contends that the statute of limitations of one year had run before suit was filed. The plaintiff, employee, was injured twice on the job, first on June 20, 1971, and again on November 1, 1971, and this suit was not filed until November 14, 1974. However, in the interim between the first injury and the filing of suit the employer and its insurer voluntarily provided medical services to the plaintiff and paid to him benefits for temporary total disability continually from November 16, 1971, to June 18, 1974. Therefore, the running of the limitations period was tolled pursuant to the provisions of T.C.A., § 50-1003, that:

". . . if within said one (1) year period voluntary payments of compensation are paid . . . an action to recover any unpaid portion of the compensation, payable under this law, may be instituted within one (1) year from the time the employer shall cease making such payments . . . ."

The furnishing of medical services by a physician employed by the employer or insurer is such a "voluntary payment of compensation." Reed v. Genesco, Inc., Tenn., 512 S.W.2d 1 (1974); Fields v. Lowe Furniture Corp., 220 Tenn. 212, 415 S.W.2d 340 (1967). The fact that no "payments" were made from November 16, 1971, the date of the first payment, until January 21, 1973, when they were resumed did not constitute a "ceasing" within the meaning of the statutory proviso. Nothing said by us in Union Carbide Corp., Food Products Div., et al. v. Cannon, Tenn., 523 S.W.2d 360 (1975) was intended to be to the contrary. Although in most cases such voluntary payments will be made at intervals of less than one year, there is no requirement in the statutory proviso that they be more frequent than one year. The trial court was correct in holding that the statute of limitations had not run.

The appellant insists that plaintiff's injury and disability was restricted to his hand and that the Chancellor erred in awarding benefits for a disability of the arm. We find no error in this regard. Both injuries were to the right wrist. Surgery was performed three times on the wrist and it was finally "fused" and made stiff. Since the fusion, the plaintiff is unable to rotate his arm so that the palm of the hand faces the floor. Dr. Bell, the treating physician, estimated plaintiff's disability as 40 per cent to the hand or 36 per cent to the arm. The Chancellor made a finding...