Updike v. Merchants' Elevator Co.

Decision Date18 June 1888
Citation96 Mo. 160,8 S.W. 779
PartiesUPDIKE v. MERCHANTS' ELEVATOR CO. et al.
CourtMissouri Supreme Court

Appeal from St. Louis circuit court; DANIEL DILLON, Judge.

Given Campbell, for appellant. Martin, Laughlin & Kern, for respondent.

BLACK, J.

This was a suit to redeem from a sale under a deed of trust. The case is here on appeal from a final judgment sustaining a demurrer to the petition. The material facts are these: The Union Steam-Mills Company made two deeds of trust on the property to secure different debts; one dated 24th March, 1880, and the other the 20th July, 1882. There was a sale by the trustee under the second deed of trust, and by mesne conveyances the title to the property, subject to the first deed of trust, became vested in Lockwood, as assignee of the Union Flour-Mills Company. The title stood in this condition on the 29th September, 1884, at which date the property was sold under the first deed of trust. Johnson held the debt secured by that deed of trust, and he became the purchaser of the property at the trustee's sale, and received a trustee's deed of the same date. He sold to Slattery, and Slattery to the defendant the elevator company It is this sale, made under the first deed of trust, from which plaintiff seeks to redeem, and his title is a deed from Lockwood, the assignee, dated 26th January, 1885. He bases his right to redeem solely upon section 3298, Rev. St. It is alleged in the petition that plaintiff has given bond and security to the satisfaction of the circuit court in favor of Johnson for the payment of the interest to accrue after the sale, and for all damages, etc.; but it is not stated when this bond was given. As the trustee's sale took place on the 29th September, 1884, and the plaintiff did not become the purchaser from Lockwood until 26th January, 1885, the bond must have been given some four months after the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
11 cases
  • State ex rel. Hopkins v. Stemmons
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • 22 Abril 1957
    ...is obvious that the purpose of requiring a redemption bond is to protect the purchaser at the foreclosure sale [Updike v. Merchants' Elevator Co., 96 Mo. 160, 162, 8 S.W. 779, 780], and we think it equally plain that the notice requirement in Section 443.430 supplements and implements other......
  • White v. Smith
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 18 Marzo 1903
    ...Rev. St. 1899, §§ 4343, 4344; Johnson v. Atchison, 90 Mo. 48, 1 S. W. 751; Godfrey v. Stock, 116 Mo. 403, 22 S. W. 733; Updike v. Elevator Co., 96 Mo. 160, 8 S. W. 779; Vanmeter v. Darrah, 115 Mo. 153, 22 S. W. 30. The Penn Insurance Company mortgage or deed of trust was foreclosed by a jud......
  • Dahlstrom v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 18 Junio 1888
  • White v. Huffman
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • 3 Septiembre 1957
    ...that, '* * * the purpose of requiring a redemption bond is to protect the purchaser at the foreclosure sale [Updike v. Merchants' Elevator Co., 96 Mo. 160, 162, 8 S.W. 779, 780], and we think it equally plain that the notice requirement in Section 443.430 supplements and implements other st......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT