Estes v. Noranda Aluminum, Inc.
Decision Date | 20 November 1978 |
Docket Number | No. 10903,10903 |
Citation | 574 S.W.2d 34 |
Parties | Virgil ESTES, Employee-Appellant, v. NORANDA ALUMINUM, INC., Employer-Respondent, Royal-Globe Insurance Company, Insurer-Respondent. |
Court | Missouri Court of Appeals |
Joseph P. Fuchs, Dempster, Fuchs and Barkett, Sikeston, for employee-appellant.
Manuel Drumm, Sikeston, for respondents.
The Circuit Court of New Madrid County reversed the order of the Industrial Commission awarding benefits to employee Virgil Estes and this appeal followed. We agree with the trial court that the evidence fails to demonstrate a causal relation between the employee's occupation and his alleged occupational disease and affirm the judgment.
Estes began employment with Noranda Aluminum in June, 1971. He worked as a laborer for three to six months, as a metal handler for six to eight months, and then was a saw operator for three or four months. His next position was as a direct chill operator and he continued in this job until August, 1973, when he sought medical aid for pain in his left leg.
One of the duties of a direct chill operator involves fluxing of molten metal. This process is accomplished by injecting chlorine gas into the bottom of the furnace by means of a wand which is about fifteen feet in length. The wand is inserted through a door in the furnace, the chlorine gas is mixed with the liquid aluminum, and any impurities which rise to the surface are skimmed off. The aluminum is then transferred from the melting furnace by way of open pouring troughs. Estes related that the fluxing process created fumes which he was exposed to, and on occasion chlorine gas leaked and escaped from the wand.
Estes was first treated by a local physician who referred him to Dr. Snyder, a Memphis, Tenn. neurological surgeon. Examination and testing in August, 1973, resulted in a diagnosis by Dr. Snyder of peripheral neuropathy, "either secondary to infectious polyneuritis or some type of toxic neuropathy," "Probable toxic neuropathy." A second visit to Dr. Snyder in August, 1973, showed little change in Estes' condition and the doctor recommended he avoid any job which required him to have any exposure to chemicals, "since his findings suggested the Possibility of a causal relationship with his general neuropathy." Further examination of Estes in November, 1973, Dr. Snyder saw Estes again in December, 1973, and February, 1974, and testing showed peripheral neuropathy. (our emphasis)
In response to a question on direct examination as to the cause of Estes' condition, based upon a reasonable medical certainty, Dr. Snyder answered:
"A: It is my Impression that this patients (sic) symptoms are Probably related to being around some type of chemicals, since the diagnosis of toxic neuropathy was made and established on the basis of his EMG (electromyogram test of electrical activity of muscle) findings, and since no other abnormality could be established as the etiology of his complaint; since the myelogram testing was normal, which ruled out any evidence of spinal cord lesion as a source of his problem; and the fact that spinal fluid studies showed no evidence of an infectious polyneuritis, then one is left with the diagnosis of toxic neuropathy, based on the fact that this person has a history of working around chemicals which Could serve as a source of the toxic neuropathy." (emphasis added)
On cross-examination, Dr. Snyder testified as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Kelley v. Banta & Stude Construction Co.
...occupational disease." Webber v. Chrysler Corp., 826 S.W.2d 51, 54 (Mo. App. 1992); Sellers, 752 S.W.2d at 416; Estes v. Noranda Aluminum, Inc., 574 S.W.2d 34, 38 (Mo. App. 1978). However, such conditions need not be the sole cause of the occupational disease, so long as they are a major co......
-
Coloney v. Accurate Superior Scale Co.
...and the occupational disease. Sheehan v. Springfield Seed & Floral, Inc., 733 S.W.2d 795, 797 (Mo.App.1987); Estes v. Noranda Aluminum, Inc., 574 S.W.2d 34, 38 (Mo.App.1978). ACCURATE relies on several cases as support for its position that a "compensable injury" does not occur until the oc......
-
Hayes v. Hudson Foods, Inc., 17470
...direct causal connection between the conditions under which the work is performed and the occupational disease. Estes v. Noranda Aluminum, Inc., 574 S.W.2d 34, 38 (Mo.App.1978). Where workers' compensation benefits are sought for a job-related carpal tunnel syndrome, a claimant must submit ......
-
Kent v. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co.
...working with and around chemicals, degreasing agents, paint and other materials). Appellant relies heavily upon Estes v. Noranda Aluminum, Inc., 574 S.W.2d 34 (Mo.App.1978), and McGrath v. Satellite Sprinkler Systems, Inc., 877 S.W.2d 704 (Mo.App.1994); however, neither case supports its po......