V.S. v. State
| Decision Date | 06 March 1984 |
| Docket Number | No. 83-668,83-668 |
| Citation | 446 So.2d 232 |
| Parties | V.S., a juvenile, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Rory S. Stein, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and Carolyn Snurkowski, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARKDULL and JORGENSON, JJ.
V.S. appeals from an adjudication of delinquency for violation of section 856.021, Florida Statutes (1981), and possession of diazepam in violation of section 893.13, Florida Statutes (1981). For the reasons which follow we reverse.
V.S. and a companion were observed by a uniformed motorcycle patrol officer who, acting on a hunch, accosted the defendant and inquired as to his presence in the area. One of the juveniles stated he was waiting for a friend and the second juvenile stated he was waiting for his brother. The officer could not recall which of those statements was attributable to V.S. When asked for identification V.S. replied that he lived approximately seven blocks away. The officer made no attempt to ascertain the accuracy of this information. V.S. was arrested for loitering and prowling and a subsequent search revealed the presence of the contraband diazepam. This record is devoid of any evidence that satisfies the criteria contained in section 856.021, Florida Statutes (1981), as that statute has been interpreted by our supreme court, see B.A.A. v. State, 356 So.2d 304 (Fla.1978); State v. Ecker, 311 So.2d 104 (Fla.1975); In the Interest of O.W., 423 So.2d 1029 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982).
Because we conclude that the arrest was unlawful the subsequent search is likewise unlawful. See Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347, 88 S.Ct. 507, 19 L.Ed.2d 576 (1967); Norman v. State, 379 So.2d 643 (Fla.1980). The trial court erred in denying V.S.'s motion to suppress.
Based on the foregoing authorities we reverse the adjudication of delinquency and remand to the trial court with directions to discharge the defendant.
Reversed and remanded with directions.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Alvarez v. City of Hialeah
...motion upon loitering arrest where only behavior police observe is defendant riding bike with bag on the road); V.S. v. State, 446 So.2d 232 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984)(loitering arrest of juvenile waiting for friend on the street unlawful as behavior insufficient to constitute loitering). At best, ......
-
D.A. v. State
...living in high crime areas would be precluded from playing and frolicking in many parts of their neighborhoods. Also in V.S. v. State, 446 So.2d 232 (Fla.3d DCA 1984), this court reversed a loitering and prowling adjudication involving a juvenile who was stopped on the street based solely o......
-
Carter v. State, 85-2413
...arrest and were subject to suppression. See C.D., 501 So.2d at 170; State v. Arnold, 475 So.2d 301 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985); V.S. v. State, 446 So.2d 232 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984). Accordingly, since the trial court erred in denying Carter's motion to suppress, we reverse his convictions. BASKIN, Judge ......
-
SP v. State, 3D02-1553.
...living in high crime areas would be precluded from playing and frolicking in many parts of their neighborhoods. Also in V.S. v. State, 446 So.2d 232 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984), this court reversed a loitering and prowling adjudication involving a juvenile who was stopped on the street based solely ......