EL v. State, Dep't of Family Servs. (In re NRL)
Decision Date | 25 February 2015 |
Docket Number | No. S–14–0217.,S–14–0217. |
Parties | In the Matter of the Termination of Parental Rights to NRL, EL and EYL, Minor Children, EL, Appellant (Respondent), v. State of Wyoming, Department of Family Services, Appellee (Petitioner). |
Court | Wyoming Supreme Court |
Order Affirming The District Court's Order Terminating Parental Rights
[¶ 1] This matter came before the Court upon the filing of Appellant's pro se “Brief Letter.” Appellant took this appeal to challenge the District Court's May 30, 2014, “Order Terminating Parental Rights of [EL]” to three minor children. That order was entered following Appellant's default. After holding a default hearing, the district court concluded there was clear and convincing evidence to support two statutory grounds for termination of Appellant's parental rights: (1) Appellant is incarcerated on a felony and unfit; and (2) the children were in foster care for 15 of 22 months and Appellant is unfit. Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 14–2–309(a)(iv) & (v).
[¶ 2] On October 16, 2014, Appellant's court-appointed appellate counsel e-filed a “Motion to Dismiss Appeal.” Counsel requested this appeal be dismissed because he could “find no basis whatsoever to advance an argument of any merit.” On November 18, 2014, this Court denied the motion to dismiss. This Court wrote that, “if counsel continues to desire to withdraw from this matter, the Anders [v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 1400, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967) ] briefing procedure (which this Court uses in criminal cases) should be followed here.”
[¶ 3] Now, this Court will take the opportunity to formally announce that it permits the filing of Anders briefs by counsel appointed to represent parents in appeals from orders terminating parental rights. After close study of the issue, this Court finds it should join the majority of jurisdictions and allow such briefs. In A.C. v. Cabinet for Health & Family Servs., 362 S.W.3d 361, 367–68 (Ky.Ct.App.2012), the court wrote:
(Footnote omitted.) This Court agrees.
[¶ 4] Next, this Court will set out the procedure counsel should follow. If counsel chooses to file an Anders brief in a termination case, counsel should file a motion to withdraw as counsel contemporaneously with the Anders brief, serve the motion and brief on the client, and ensure that the complete trial court record is transmitted to this Court for review.
[¶ 5] Turning back to the matter at hand, on December 18, 2014, appointed counsel filed a motion to withdraw as counsel and an Anders brief. Following a careful review of the record and the Anders brief submitted by counsel, this Court, on January 21, 2015, entered its “Order Granting Motion for Court–Appointed Counsel to Withdraw.” That Order notified Appellant that the District Court's May 30, 2014, “Order Terminating Parental...
To continue reading
Request your trial