Vann v. Southern R. Co.

Decision Date13 October 1920
Docket Number250.
Citation104 S.E. 170,180 N.C. 659
PartiesVANN ET UX. v. SOUTHERN R. CO. ET AL.
CourtNorth Carolina Supreme Court

Appeal from Superior Court, Wake County; F. A. Daniels, Judge.

Action by R. T. Vann and wife against the Southern Railroad Company, Walker D. Hines, Director General of Railroads, and another. Judgment for plaintiff Ella R. Vann and against named defendants, and named defendants appeal. No error.

A railroad is properly joined as a defendant with the Director General of Railroads in action for injuries sustained while the railroad was under federal control.

Wm. B. Snow, of Raleigh, for appellants.

Jones & Bailey and R. N. Simms, all of Raleigh, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

There were divers exceptions assigned as error, but they were all abandoned in this court, save exception 4, that the court overruled the motion of the Southern Railroad Company, to dismiss the action as to it "upon the ground and because of its nonliability by reason of federal control," which motion was in writing and is set out in the record.

It is not necessary to discuss this point, as it was fully considered and decided in Clements v. Railroad, 179 N.C. 225, 102 S.E. 399, as to the same defendant in which we affirmed the decision in Hill v. Director General, 178 N.C. 609, 101 S.E. 376, that the Director General was, in effect, a receiver, and therefore the action will lie against him under the act of Congress, and that the defendant, the Southern Railroad Company was properly joined as a codefendant under the rulings in Logan v. Railroad, 116 N.C. 940, 21 S.E. 959, Harden v. Railroad, 129 N.C. 354, 40 S.E. 184, 55 L. R. A. 784, 85 Am. St. Rep. 747, and the uniform decisions of this court since.

The decision in Clements v. Railroad and other cases cited above, and the reasons therefor, were reviewed and reaffirmed in Gilliam v. Railroad, 179 N.C. 508, 103 S.E. 10.

Upon the authority of the above cases, and for the reasons therein given, we find in this appeal no error.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Parker v. Seaboard Air Line Ry.
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • March 16, 1921
    ... ... 376, citing numerous cases. The above have been reviewed and ... reaffirmed since in Gilliam v. Railroad, 179 N.C ... 508, 103 S.E. 10; Vann v. Railroad, 180 N.C. 659, ... 104 S.E. 170; McGovern v. Railroad, 180 N.C. 219, ... 104 S.E. 534 ...          The ... plaintiff ... ...
  • MacGovern & Co., Inc. v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • October 20, 1920
    ... ... 508, 103 S.E. 10, and Hill v ... Director General, 178 N.C. 609, 101 S.E. 376, which have ... been reaffirmed at this term in Vann v. Railroad, ... 180 N.C. 659, 104 S.E. 170 ...          General ... Orders Nos. 18 and 18a, relied upon by the defendants, ... ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT