Viar v. North Carolina Dept. of Transp.
| Court | United States State Supreme Court of North Carolina |
| Citation | 610 S.E.2d 360,359 N.C. 400 |
| Docket Number | No. 109A04.,109A04. |
| Parties | Claude M. VIAR, Jr., Co-administrator of the Estate of Megan Rae Viar, Deceased, and Co-administrator of the Estate of Macey Lauren Viar, Deceased v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. |
| Decision Date | 07 April 2005 |
610 S.E.2d 360
359 N.C. 400
v.
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
No. 109A04.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
April 7, 2005.
DeVore, Acton & Stafford, P.A., by Fred W. DeVore, III, Charlotte, for plaintiffs-appellees.
Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by William H. Borden, Special Deputy Attorney General, Robert T. Hargett, Special Deputy Attorney General, and Ann Reed, Senior Deputy Attorney General, for the defendant-appellant.
PER CURIAM.
On appeal to this Court, defendant contends that plaintiff's appeal should be dismissed in accordance with Judge Tyson's dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals for violation of the Rules of Appellate Procedure. We agree.
The North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure are mandatory and "failure to follow these rules will subject an appeal to dismissal." Steingress v. Steingress, 350 N.C. 64, 65, 511 S.E.2d 298, 299 (1999). In the instant case, plaintiff has failed to comply with Rule 10 and Rule 28(b). With respect
(1) Form; Record References. A listing of the assignments of error upon which an appeal is predicated shall be stated at the conclusion of the record on appeal in short form without argument, and shall be separately numbered. Each assignment of error shall so far as practicable, be confined to a single issue of law; and shall state plainly, concisely and without argumentation the legal basis upon which error is assigned. An assignment of error is sufficient if it directs the attention of the appellate court to the particular error about which the question is made, with clear and specific record or transcript references. Questions made as to several issues or findings relating to one ground of recovery or defense may be combined in one assignment of error, if separate record or transcript references are made.
N.C. R.App. P. 10(c)(1). In this case, plaintiff presented two assignments of error, neither of which was numbered or made specific record references. Moreover, the second stated assignment of error did not "state plainly, concisely and without argumentation the legal basis upon which error [was] assigned."
With respect to an appellant's brief, Rule 28(b) requires the following:
(6) An argument, to contain the contentions of the appellant with respect to...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
King v. Bryant, 294PA14
...S.E.2d 870, 886 (2004) ), and "[i]t is not the role of the appellate court[ ] ... to create [his] appeal," Viar v. N.C. Dep't of Transp. , 359 N.C. 400, 402, 610 S.E.2d 360, 361 (2005) (per curiam), it seems this Court is more than willing to do so for him when arbitration is involved.Our c......
-
State v. Corbett, 73A20
...and an appellee is left without notice of the basis upon which an appellate court might rule." Viar v. N.C. Dep't of Transp. , 359 N.C. 400, 402, 610 S.E.2d 360, 361 (2005).¶ 72 Defendants’ argument regarding the evidence of the blood stain on defendant Martens's boxer shorts was not preser......
-
The Charlotte–mecklenburg Hosp. Auth. v. Talford, COA10–897.
...in light of Defendant's complete failure to challenge this aspect of the trial court's judgment on appeal. Viar v. N.C. Dept. of Transp., 359 N.C. 400, 402, 610 S.E.2d 360, 361 (2005) (stating that “[i]t is not the role of the appellate courts ... to create an appeal for an appellant”). 3. ......
-
Hardin v. Kcs Intern., Inc., COA08-996.
...process" as one factor for determining whether default under appellate rules is gross or substantial); Viar v. N.C. Dep't of Transp., 359 N.C. 400, 402, 610 S.E.2d 360, 361 (2005) (discouraging appellate courts from reviewing merits of appeal when review would leave appellee "without notice......