Villalon v. People
Decision Date | 30 January 1961 |
Docket Number | No. 19489,19489 |
Citation | 358 P.2d 1018,145 Colo. 327 |
Parties | John VILLALON, Plaintiff in Error, v. PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Defendant in Error. |
Court | Colorado Supreme Court |
Sam T. Taylor, Walsenburg, for plaintiff in error.
Duke W. Dunbar, Atty. Gen., State of Colorado, Frank E. Hickey, Deputy Atty. Gen., Robert G. Pierce, Asst. Atty. Gen., for defendant in error.
Plaintiff in error was defendant in the trial court and will hereinafter be referred to as defendant.
On March 3, 1955 defendant was charged in a 4 count criminal information with kidnapping (count 1), assault with a deadly weapon with the intent to kill or murder (count 2), a prior felony conviction (burglary) in 1949 resulting in a sentence to the State Reformatory (count 3), a prior felony conviction (grand larceny) in 1951 resulting in a sentence to the State Penitentiary (count 4). Although the record fails to disclose either the date when defendant was arraigned or the pleas entered by him, it is readily apparent from the number and nature of trials which followed that when arraigned he entered a special plea of not guilty by reason of insanity at the time of the alleged commission of the offenses; a general plea of not guilty to counts 1 and 2, and denied that he was the person referred to in counts 3 and 4 of the information. On June 30, 1955 a jury returned a verdict finding defendant sane at the time of the alleged commission of the offenses charged in counts 1 and 2 of the information, and on July 11, 1955 a different jury found defendant guilty as charged in counts 1 and 2 of the information. Following receipt of these verdicts defendant was granted thirty days to file a motion for new trial. On July 12, 1955 apparently the same jury which had on July 11, 1955 found the defendant guilty under counts 1 and 2 returned verdicts finding defendant to be the same person referred to in counts 3 and 4 of the information. Defendant was again granted thirty days to file a motion for new trial. In due time motion for new trial was filed, and was argued and denied on September 6, 1955. On that same date the trial court imposed sentence as follows:
'And now neither the said defendant nor his counsel for him saying anything further why the judgment of the Court should not now be pronounced against him on the verdict of guilty as to Count No. 1; having twice before been convicted of felonies and sentenced under section 39-13-1 C.R.S.1953 heretofore rendered in this in this cause
On May 29, 1957 defendant filed a 'Motion to set aside a void and erroneous judgment, to discharge defendant or re-sentence him nunc pro tunc in accordance with the law * * *', and as grounds therefor it was contended that defendant was only nineteen years of age at the time he allegedly suffered the 'felony' conviction referred to in count 3 of the information, and that accordingly under the definition of a 'felony' as that word is defined by this court is Smalley v. People, 134 Colo. 360, 304 P.2d 902 (decided December 3, 1956; rehearing denied December 31, 1956) defendant did not in fact suffer a 'felony' conviction when in 1949 he was convicted of burglary and sentenced to the State Reformatory. This motion was argued on June 3, 1957, at which time the trial court granted the motion, vacated the previous sentences and re-sentenced defendant to not less than 29 years nor more than 30 years under count 1, and not less than 13 years nor more than 14 years under count 2, such sentences to run consecutively.
On April 6, 1960 defendant again filed with the trial court a 'Motion to set aside a void and erroneous judgment and sentence; to discharge defendant, and for other orders.' On May 16, 1960 this motion, after argument, was denied by the trial court, and the defendant is here by writ of error seeking...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
People v. Emig
...which is void. Casias v. People, 148 Colo. 544, 367 P.2d 327, cert. den. 369 U.S. 862, 82 S.Ct. 952, 8 L.Ed.2d 20; Villalon v. People, 145 Colo. 327, 358 P.2d 1018; Crim.P. 35(a). However, by resentencing defendant in the way it did, the trial court failed to take cognizance of the critical......
-
Smith v. Johns, 26646
...the subject matter, and has imposed a sentence in error, the court retains jurisdiction to correct the sentence. See Villalon v. People, 145 Colo. 327, 358 P.2d 1018 (1961), and cases cited therein. Conversely, if the original sentence is a valid one, the trial court loses jurisdiction to c......
-
People v. Jenkins, 76-776
...C.R.S.1973, enunciated in People v. Herrera, supra. See Casias v. People, 148 Colo. 544, 367 P.2d 327 (1961); Villalon v. People, 145 Colo. 327, 358 P.2d 1018 (1961); Crim.P. The judgment is, therefore, reversed, and the cause is remanded with directions to resentence the defendant under th......
-
Casias v. People
...approved by this Court on repeated occasions and in nowise violates any constitutionally protected rights. See Villalon v. People, 145 Colo. 327, 358 P.2d 1018, wherein numerous decisions of this Court are cited in support of the proposition that a trial court which enters an erroneous judg......