VL ORLANDO BUILDING CORP. v. AGD HOSP. DESIGN & PURCHASING, INC., 4D99-2354.

Decision Date24 May 2000
Docket NumberNo. 4D99-2354.,4D99-2354.
Citation762 So.2d 956
PartiesVL ORLANDO BUILDING CORP., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. AGD HOSPITALITY DESIGN & PURCHASING, INC., a Florida corporation, Joel Miron and Vincent Meola, Appellees.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Cynthia J. Hoover and Robby H. Birnbaum of Greenspoon, Marder, Hirschfeld, Rafkin, Ross & Berger, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Dario A. Perez and Gary M. Bagliebter of Shutts & Bowen LLP, Miami, for appellees.

KLEIN, J.

Appellant VL Orlando Building Corp. (VL), the owner of property in Orlando, sued appellee, AGD Hospitality Design & Purchasing, Inc. (AGD), for breach of a construction contract for improvements on that property. It filed the suit, however, in Broward County. The contractor, AGD, filed a counterclaim requesting, among other things, foreclosure of a mechanic's lien on the Orlando property. The contractor also moved to transfer venue to Orange County, which the trial court granted, and it is that order which has been appealed.

The owner argues that its suit against the contractor was properly filed in Broward because the contractor's principal place of business is in Broward. The owner contends that the trial court should have granted its motion to dismiss the count for a mechanic's lien on the ground that the Broward court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over that count, because the property was in Orange County. Georgia Cas. v. O'Donnell, 109 Fla. 290, 147 So. 267 (1933)(actions to foreclose liens are regarded as local and can be brought only in the county in which the land lies).

The owner reasons that if the Broward court had no subject matter jurisdiction over the Orlando property, it could only dismiss the mechanic's lien count, not transfer that count along with the rest of the case. Apparently the owner believes that if it had been successful in having the mechanic's lien count dismissed, there would no longer have been any basis for the Broward court to have transferred the remaining counts to Orange County.

The owner's assumption that the Broward circuit court did not have subject matter jurisdiction over the mechanic's lien count is incorrect. Although the exclusive jurisdiction of a circuit court to foreclose a lien on property in that circuit has been loosely referred to as subject matter jurisdiction, Hudlett v. Sanderson, 715 So.2d 1050 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998) and cases cited, that is a misnomer. Subject matter jurisdiction means "the power of the court to adjudicate the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
12 cases
  • Klem v. Espejo-Norton, 3D06-3080.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • June 25, 2008
    ...constructive trust. See Beta Real Corp. v. Graham, 839 So.2d 890, 892 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003); VL Orlando Bldg. Corp. v. AGD Hospitality Design & Purchasing, Inc., 762 So.2d 956, 957 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) ("Although the exclusive jurisdiction of a circuit court to foreclose a lien on property in t......
  • Point Conversions, LLC v. WPB Hotel Partners, LLC
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • June 2, 2021
    ...power of the court to adjudicate the class of cases to which the particular case belongs.’ " VL Orlando Bldg. Corp. v. AGD Hosp. Design & Purchasing, Inc ., 762 So. 2d 956, 957 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) (citation omitted). However, Congress has granted federal district courts original jurisdictio......
  • Partridge v. Partridge
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • August 15, 2001
    ...power of the court to adjudicate the class of cases to which the particular case belongs." VL Orlando Bldg. Corp. v. AGD Hospitality Design & Purchasing, Inc., 762 So.2d 956, 957 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) (quoting Crill v. State Road Dep't, 96 Fla. 110, 117 So. 795, 798 (1928)). It is an issue th......
  • Demorizi v. Demorizi, 3D02-2063.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • July 30, 2003
    ...venue frequently cite to the avoidance of piecemeal litigation as its rationale. See, e.g., VL Orlando Bldg. Corp. v. AGD Hospitality Design & Purchasing, Inc., 762 So.2d 956 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) (affirming transfer of venue in the interest of justice to avoid piecemeal litigation). Our rule......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Venue considerations in construction disputes.
    • United States
    • Florida Bar Journal Vol. 84 No. 5, May 2010
    • May 1, 2010
    ...real property should be brought in the county in which the property is located. (23) In VL Orlando Building Corp. v. A.G.D. Hospitality, 762 So. 2d 956 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000), the Fourth District affirmed the transfer of the construction lien foreclosure action to the county where the real pro......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT