Volbers-Klarich v. Middletown Mgt., Inc., 2010 Ohio 2168 (Ohio 5/18/2010)
| Decision Date | 18 May 2010 |
| Docket Number | No. 2009-0933.,2009-0933. |
| Citation | Volbers-Klarich v. Middletown Mgt., Inc., 2010 Ohio 2168 (Ohio 5/18/2010), 2010 Ohio 2168, 2010 Ohio 2057, No. 2009-0933. (Ohio May 18, 2010) |
| Parties | Volbers-Klarich v. Middletown Mgt., Inc. |
| Court | Ohio Supreme Court |
MERIT DECISION WITH OPINION
Judgment of the court of appeals affirmed in part and reversed in part, and cause remanded to the trial court.
Brown, C.J., not participating.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
12 cases
-
Alexander Local Sch. Dist. Bd. of Educ. v. Vill. of Albany
...granted. "[A] Civ.R. 12(B)(6) motion to dismiss tests only the sufficiency of the allegations." Volbers–Klarich v. Middletown Mgt., Inc. , 125 Ohio St.3d 494, 2010-Ohio-2057, 929 N.E.2d 434, ¶ 9, citing Assn. for the Defense of the Washington Local School Dist. v. Kiger, 42 Ohio St.3d 116, ......
-
Colley v. Crabtree
...sic.) Student Doe v. Adkins, 2021-Ohio-3389, 178 N.E.3d 947, ¶ 19 (4th Dist.), quoting Volbers-Klarich v. Middletown Mgt., Inc., 125 Ohio St.3d 494, 2010-Ohio-2057, 929 N.E.2d 434, ¶ 9. This means that " ‘courts cannot rely on evidence or allegations outside the complaint to determine a Civ......
-
State v. Floyd
...a motion to dismiss, a court generally may not consider evidence outside the petition. See Volbers-Klarich v. Middletown Mgt., Inc., 125 Ohio St.3d 494, 2010-Ohio-2057, 929 N.E.2d 434, ¶ 11. An exception exists, however, when an event causes a case to become moot. State ex rel. Ames v. Summ......
-
State v. Floyd
...a motion to dismiss, a court generally may not consider evidence outside the petition. See Volbers-Klarich v. Middletown Mgt., Inc., 125 Ohio St.3d 494, 2010-Ohio-2057, 929 N.E.2d 434, ¶ 11 An exception exists, however, when an event causes a case to become moot. State ex rel. Ames v. Summi......
Get Started for Free