W. C. Belcher Land Mortgage Co. v. Clark
Decision Date | 14 January 1922 |
Docket Number | (No. 9529.)<SMALL><SUP>*</SUP></SMALL> |
Citation | 238 S.W. 685 |
Parties | W. C. BELCHER LAND MORTGAGE CO. v. CLARK et al. |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Appeal from District Court, Parker County; F. O. McKinsey, Judge.
Action by W. P. Clark and others against the W. C. Belcher Land Mortgage Company. Judgment for the plaintiffs after trial on agreed statement of facts, and defendant appeals. Affirmed.
Thompson, Barwise, Wharton & Hiner, and Wm. J. Berne, all of Fort Worth, for appellant.
Hood & Shadle, of Weatherford, for appellees.
This case was submitted to the trial court upon an agreed statement of facts under our statutes. We quote such parts of the agreed statement as we think necessary to an understanding of our conclusion. It was agreed that Mrs. F. C. Clark owned "in her own right" two surveys of land situated in Parker county, Tex., aggregating 189 acres, that Mrs. F. C. Clark and her husband, J. M. Clark, owned as community property another survey of 160 acres in Parker county, and that "good title thereto is shown by the records in the parties above named at the time they acquired the same."
On the 1st day of March, 1907, J. M. Clark and wife, F. C. Clark, executed and delivered to H. W. Byers and wife, Lillie F. Byers, a deed to the land above described, for a consideration of $12,000, of which $4,165.05 was paid in cash, with three vendor's lien notes for $2,000 each, of even date with the deed, bearing 10 per cent. interest from their date and made payable on the 1st of March, 1909, 1911 and 1913, respectively. To secure the payment of said notes the vendor's lien was expressly reserved in the deed.
Mrs. F. C. Clark died in Parker county, Tex., July 20, 1907. Her will bore date of May 28, 1906, and was signed "Courtney Clark," the name by which Mrs. F. C. Clark was generally and commonly known. The will was duly probated and "admitted for record on the 4th day of September, 1907," with its attestation recorded in Probate Book 10, page 1, Parker County, Tex. Her husband, J. M. Clark, was appointed independent executor with direction that no other action be taken in the county court in the administration of her estate other than to record the will and return an inventory and appraisement of her estate and list of claims. It contained, among others, the following paragraphs:
J. M. Clark, as executor, and others, as appraisers, returned and filed in the probate court of Parker county, on September 13, 1907, an inventory and list of claims. The inventory specified the three vendor's lien notes executed by Byers and wife; it being declared in connection therewith that an interest therein of $1,200 was the separate property of the deceased. The inventory and list of claims was recorded in the probate minutes of Parker county on September 16, 1907, and was in all things properly approved by the probate court of Parker county.
The deed was in the form of a general warranty deed, but the vendor's lien was retained against the property conveyed "until the above-described notes and all interest thereon are fully paid according to their face and tenor, effect and reading, when this deed shall become absolute."
The deed of trust authorized a sale of the premises in case of default on the part of Clark on the payment of his notes.
Thereafter, on November 3, 1908, J. M. Clark, by warranty deed, conveyed the lands in controversy to J. W. Clark "in consideration of $2,000 paid by J. M. Clark as follows: $2,000 cash in hand to me paid, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged; also the assumption by grantee of two notes for the sum of $2,500 and $2,000, respectively, executed by J. M. Clark on January 1, 1908, and payable to the W. C. Belcher Land Mortgage Company at Fort Worth, Tex., five and eight years after date, and also all interest accruing or to accrue on said notes, all fully described in a deed of trust executed by J. M. Clark" to secure the mortgage company. While the deed is in the form of a warranty deed, the grant is only to "all of the grantee's interest in and to" the lands in question. Later, to wit, on the 30th day of March, 1920, J. M. Clark died intestate in Parker county.
At the maturity of the obligations described in the deed of trust executed by J. M. Clark to the mortgage company, and which were assumed by J. W. Clark in the deed last above mentioned, the same were renewed, and a new obligation was executed by said J. W. Clark in favor of the W. C. Belcher Land Mortgage Company in the sum of $6,000, dated December 28, 1912, due five years after date, to secure payment of which J. W. Clark executed a deed of trust in form substantially similar to that executed by J. M. Clark, reference therein being expressly made to the deed and lien mentioned in the deed from Byers and wife to J. M. Clark, and reference also being made to "the original debt for the unpaid portion of the purchase money of said real estate and premises."
It further appears that J. W. Clark failed to pay the obligation in the deed of trust executed by him, and by virtue of its terms the mortgage company sold the lands in question, at which sale the W. C. Belcher Land Mortgage Company became the purchaser and thereafter sold to one W. M. Brown.
We deem it material only to further quote the following paragraphs of the agreed statement on which the case was submitted:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Howth v. Farrar
...of the county where the will is probated, and though they may be, they do not have to be, recorded as deeds are. Belcher Land Mortgage Co. v. Clark, Tex.Civ.App., 238 S.W. 685; Lynch v. Baxter, 4 Tex. 431, 51 Am.Dec. 735; Glover v. Coit, 36 Tex.Civ.App. 104, 81 S.W. 136; Perdue v. Perdue, T......
-
Alexander v. Harris
...235; Standford v. Finks, 45 Tex. Civ. App. 30, 99 S. W. 452; Bass v. James, 83 Tex. 110, 18 S. W. 336; W. C. Belcher Land Mortgage Co. v. W. P. Clark et al. (Tex. Civ. App.) 238 S. W. 685 (writ of error denied), and decisions there From the foregoing conclusions, it follows that the judgmen......
-
Maxwell v. Harrell
...to the remaindermen, and could destroy or cut off their remainders only as authorized by the terms of the will. W. C. Belcher Land Mort. Co. v. Clark, 238 S.W. 685, writ refused; McMurray v. Stanley, 69 Tex. 227, 229, 6 S.W. 412. She could not dispose of such property by gift or by will and......
-
Townsend v. Chaillett
...App.) 242 S. W. 722; Id. (Tex. Com. App.) 248 S. W. 25; Pearce v. Dyess, 45 Tex. Civ. App. 406, 101 S. W. 549; Belcher Land Mortgage Co. v. Clark (Tex. Civ. App.) 238 S. W. 685. The evidence in this case simply shows that John Chaillett first became interested in the land as agent for his w......