W. T. Rawleigh Medical Co. v. Ellis
Decision Date | 11 February 1918 |
Docket Number | 155 |
Citation | 201 S.W. 110,132 Ark. 421 |
Parties | THE W. T. RAWLEIGH MEDICAL COMPANY v. ELLIS |
Court | Arkansas Supreme Court |
Appeal from Ouachita Circuit Court; C. W. Smith, Judge; reversed.
Judgment reversed.
J. W Warren, for appellant.
1. The note sued on was given in settlement of an account for which appellee was liable. No payment nor fraud was shown. 129 Ark 384.
2. The contract was for a sale of goods and is unambiguous. The sale was made in Illinois on orders. 126 Ark. 597; 129 Ark. 384.
3. The court erred in its instructions. Parol evidence was not admissible to vary the terms of a written instrument. 181 S.W. 273; 188 Id. 566; 190 Id. 564; 182 Id. 106; 183 Id. 541.
4. Settlement of the account was a sufficient consideration for the execution of the note. 44 Ark. 556; 128 Ark. 10.
Thos W. Hardy, for appellees.
1. Appellant is a foreign corporation and had not complied with the laws of Arkansas and was doing business in this State. 193 S.W. 497; 115 Ark. 176; 163 S.W. 757; 128 Ark. 211.
2. The contract is ambiguous and uncertain as to whether Ellis was an agent or purchaser. The issues were properly submitted to the jury. 115 Ark. 176; 124 Id. 543.
3. The case was submitted to the jury under proper instructions and their verdict is conclusive.
The parties to this litigation entered into the following contract:
By W. T. Rawleigh, President.
Pursuant to the terms of this contract, merchandise of the kind there named was furnished to E. P. Ellis, and, after all proper credits had been given and allowed, there finally remained due the sum of $ 269.96, for which sum a note was executed to the order of the medical company, and this suit was brought to enforce the payment of that note; but the right to maintain it is denied upon the ground that the medical company, the plaintiff below and appellant here, is a foreign corporation and has not complied with the laws of this State authorizing it to do business in this State. The medical company admits that it is a foreign corporation, and that it has not complied with the laws of this State authorizing it to do business here; but it denies that it has been doing business in this State.
It is asserted on the one hand, that the contract between the parties, out of which this...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
W.T. Rawleigh Co. v. Van Duyn
... ... v ... Holloway, 182 Mo.App. 140, 168 S.W. 290; J. R ... Watkins Med. Co. v. Coombes (Okl.), 166 P. 1072; W. T ... Rawleigh Med. Co. v. Ellis, 132 Ark. 421, 201 S.W. 110.) ... The ... question of what facts constitute transaction of interstate ... commerce within the meaning of ... contract: ... "Whereas, ... E. M. Van Duyn, of Eagle, Idaho, desires to purchase of the ... W. T. Rawleigh Medical Company, of Freeport, Illinois, on ... credit and at wholesale prices, to sell again on his own ... account to consumers, medicines, extracts, ... ...
-
Geerdes v. J. R. Watkins Co.
...628; J. R. Watkins Co. v. Rachal, La.App., 31 So.2d 871; J. R. Watkins Co. v. Goudeau, La.App., 63 So.2d 161; W. T. Rawleigh Medical Co. v. Ellis, 132 Ark. 421, 201 S.W. 110; W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. Tiffin, 200 Ark. 427, 139 S.W.2d 252; W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. Harper, 173 Wash. 233, 22 P.2d ...
-
W. T. Rawleigh Medical Co. v. Rose
... ... introduced and read over the objection of appellant ... Appellee ... concedes that the written contract is identical with the ... contract passed on by this court in the recent case of ... W. T. Rawleigh Medical Company v ... Ellis, 132 Ark. 421, 201 S.W. 110, and, for that ... reason, does not longer urge that the written contract ... constitutes one of principal and agency. In that case this ... court held that a contract identical with this was not ... ambiguous and that it constituted a contract of sale and ... ...
- W. T. Rawleigh Medical Co. v. Ellis