W.W. Fowler Oil Co. v. Hamby, A89A0286

Decision Date11 July 1989
Docket NumberNo. A89A0286,A89A0286
Citation385 S.E.2d 106,192 Ga.App. 422
PartiesW.W. FOWLER OIL COMPANY et al. v. HAMBY.
CourtGeorgia Court of Appeals

Cone & Shivers, Benjamin J. Johnson, Atlanta, for appellants.

John F. Sweet, Atlanta, for appellee.

POPE, Judge.

The issue presented in this workers' compensation appeal is whether the mere touching of the head of an employee with a gun by an armed robber, without any physical injury, is a sufficient discernible physical occurrence to support compensation for the resulting emotional and psychic problems experienced by the employee. The Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) and the Board found that it was not sufficient; the superior court found that it was and reversed the Board. We granted this discretionary appeal to consider the issue. The ALJ found the following facts:

"1. The claimant was working as a clerk at a convenience store owned by the employer/insurer in the early hours of August 9, 1986, when the establishment was robbed.

"2. The robber held a gun to the claimant's head and threatened her.

"3. There was an actual physical touching of the gun to the claimant's head just behind the ear, but she was not physically harmed in any way by this contact.

"4. Subsequent to the robbery, the claimant developed certain psychic problems, in that she became extremely nervous and was afraid to be alone. The claimant has never suffered any physical problem or injury as a result of the incident."

Claimant's theory is that her emotional and psychic problems stem not from the fright of the robbery as a whole, but rather from the act of the robber putting the gun against her head. Claimant argues that this touching is a sufficient discernible physical occurrence to meet the requirements of Georgia law as outlined in Hanson Buick v. Chatham, 163 Ga.App. 127, 292 S.E.2d 428 (1982). The superior court agreed and found that claimant's testimony that "[w]hen the gun hit my head, it ... my nerves went all to pieces" showed a "discernible physical occurrence" from which claimant's psychological problems directly flowed.

We find that claimant and the superior court have mistaken our meaning in the phrase "discernible physical occurrence." The court's discussion of authorities in Chatham, supra, shows that "discernible physical occurrence" means a physical injury or harm, not merely a touching that can be fixed in time. The cases relied upon by the court in Chatham are couched in terms of "physical injury." On motion for rehearing, the court explained that it defined "accident" in terms of "discernible physical occurrence"...

To continue reading

Request your trial
11 cases
  • Southwire Co. v. George
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • June 3, 1996
    ...68, 348 S.E.2d 563 (1986) (post-traumatic stress syndrome arising from a physical injury is compensable); W.W. Fowler Oil Co. v. Hamby, 192 Ga.App. 422, 385 S.E.2d 106 (1989) (psychic trauma must arise naturally and unavoidably from some discernible, physical The claimant herein suffered a ......
  • Slater v. McKinsey & Company, Inc. United States
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Georgia
    • March 30, 2021
    ...injury or harm." Oliver v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. , 209 Ga. App. 703, 704, 434 S.E.2d 500, 501 (1993) (citing W.W. Fowler Oil Co. v. Hamby , 192 Ga. App. 422, 385 S.E.2d 106 (1989) ; Hanson Buick v. Chatham , 163 Ga. App. 127, 129, 292 S.E.2d 428 (1982) ); but see Betts v. Medcross Imaging C......
  • State v. Cephas
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Delaware
    • September 14, 1993
    ...554 So.2d 1034 (1989).6 Lil Champ Food Stores, Inc. v. Powers, Fla.Dist.Ct.App., 569 So.2d 464 (1990).7 W.W. Fowler Oil Co. v. Hamby, 192 Ga.App. 422, 385 S.E.2d 106 (1989).8 Love v. McDonald's Restaurant, 13 Kan.App.2d 397, 771 P.2d 557 (1989).9 Johnson v. Paul's Auto & Truck Sales, Inc., ......
  • Lightning v. Roadway Exp., Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit
    • August 16, 1995
    ...428-30 (1982); see also Oliver v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 209 Ga.App. 703, 434 S.E.2d 500, 500-01 (1993); W.W. Fowler Oil Co. v. Hamby, 192 Ga.App. 422, 385 S.E.2d 106, 106-07 (1989). Consequently, Roadway's claim that the Act provides the exclusive means for Lightning's remedy lacks E. Prop......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT