Wade v. Atlantic Lumber Co.
Decision Date | 06 April 1906 |
Citation | 41 So. 72,51 Fla. 638 |
Parties | WADE v. ATLANTIC LUMBER CO. |
Court | Florida Supreme Court |
On Rehearing, June 1, 1906.
In Banc. Appeal from Circuit Court, Taylor County; Bascom H Palmer, Judge.
Bill by the Atlantic Lumber Company against Neill G. Wade. Decree for plaintiff, and defendant appeals. Reversed, and bill dismissed.
Syllabus by the Court
When the journals of the Legislature speak as to the title of an act, and the enrolled bill contains a variance therefrom, the journals will control.
The title, 'An act to incorporate the Atlantic, Suwannee River & Gulf Railroad Company' (Laws 1893, p. 223, c 4267), is not sufficiently broad to apprise the Legislature and the people that a land grant to be selected by the company from the state at large will be included thereunder and such grant, not being within the subject expressed in the title, is void.
The mere fact that legislative grants have been at various times included in acts with titles too restrictive is not sufficient to force the courts to disregard a plain mandate of the Constitution directed against surreptitious legislation.
On Rehearing.
Concession of counsel as to irregularity in the passage of a law will not influence the court in determining the constitutionality of an act of the Legislature.
Parol evidence is not admissible against the affirmative showing of the journals of the Legislature.
COUNSEL Wm. Wade Hampton, R. W. Williams, W. S Jennings, and Bryan & Bryan, for appellant.
Maxwell & Reeves and Jno. T. Walker, for appellee.
The Atlantic Lumber Company, claiming as assignee of the Atlantic, Suwanee River & Gulf Railway Company, filed its bill of complaint in the circuit court for Taylor county against Neill G. Wade, praying that the said Wade be decreed to hold certain 'swamp and overflowed' lands, deeded to him by the trustees of the internal improvement fund, in trust for the complainant, and that it be adjudged that the complainant is the rightful owner of the lands. There were prayers for injunctions and general relief. To this bill a demurrer was interposed, and this appeal is taken from the order of the court overruling the demurrer.
Many interesting questions of grave import have been ably and exhaustively argued before us, respecting the power of the Legislature to interfere with the trustees of the internal improvement fund to the extent sought to be done in the instant case and also with reference to the powers, duties, and discretions conferred upon the said trustees by the act of 1855, as also the whole policy and scheme underlying the donation by the United States of the swamp and overflowed lands to the state of Florida.
On view, however, of the conclusions reached by the court, it is not only not necessary to determine these questions; but it would be improper for us to do so. The court should not lightly pass upon the power of a co-ordinate branch, but only when necessity impels such step.
Before we are called upon to pass upon the power of the Legislature to make the grant claimed here, we are confronted with the preliminary question whether the Legislature has sought to exercise such power in the manner and form prescribed by the Constitution; and, having reached the conclusion that it has not done so, we shall proceed no further.
The complainant below, appellee here, bases its claim solely upon sections 9, 10, 18, c. 4267, pp. 225, 228, of the Laws of 1893. These sections read as follows:
The complainant exercised its option under section 10, and took 'floats,' which it asserts might be located upon any unappropriated swamp and overflowed lands within the domain of the state.
Is the title to the act sufficiently broad to embrace such a grant?
As printed, chapter 4267 bears the title, 'An act to incorporate the Atlantic, Suwannee River & Gulf Railway Company, to grant said corporation certain privileges, and to aid the construction thereof.'
The journals of the two houses of the Legislature disclose, however, that the bill which was voted on by them bore at its passage the title merely, 'A bill to be entitled 'An act to incorporate the Atlantic, Suwannee River & Gulf Railroad Company,” and was designated further as 'House Bill 99.' The bill, after its passage by the House, appears by the Senate Journal to have been amended in that body, and the House Journal shows affirmatively and specifically what that amendment was, and the concurrence by the House in the designated amendment. The bill by its short original title was referred to the joint committee on enrolled bills, and subsequently there appears a report from this committee to the House that it finds correctly enrolled, not House Bill 99, nor a 'bill to be entitled 'An act to incorporate the Atlantic, Suwannee River & Gulf Railway Company,” but 'An act to incorporate the Atlantic, Suwannee River & Gulf Railway Company, to grant said corporation certain privileges and to aid the construction thereof,' which 'act' was signed by the Speaker. The Senate Journal, subsequent to the passage of the House Bill 99 with the short title, is silent therein, unless, except, and until the joint committee report the presentation to the Governor for his signature to the 'act' with the changed and enlarged title, and on the day thereafter the announcement by the President that he was signing the 'act.'
This court is firmly committed to the holding that when the journal speak they control, and, as against such proof, the enrolled bill is not conclusive. We are further committed to the proposition that a material change in the title to a bill as signed by the presiding officers of the Legislature and as signed by the Gevernor is fatal. State ex rel. Attorney the Governor is fatal. State ex rel. Attorney 334, and cases cited.
Under such precedents, the counsel for the appellee were justified in conceding that they were...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Amos v. Gunn
... ... Turner v. Hocker, 36 Fla. 358, 18 So. 767; ... West v. State. 50 Fla. 154, 39 So. 412; Wade v ... Atlantic Lumber Co., 51 Fla. 638, 41 So. 72; Rushton ... v. State, 58 Fla. 94, 50 So ... ...
-
City of Winter Haven v. A. M. Klemm & Son
... ... miles more or less, to the western boundary of the Atlantic ... Coast Line Railway right-of-way; thence southwesterly along ... said right-of-way line to a ... jurisdiction of municipalities established by statutes. See ... cases last above cited. In Wade v. Atlantic Lumber ... Co., 51 Fla. 628, 41 So. 72, and like cases, the ... doctrine of de facto ... ...
-
Amos v. Mathews
... ... 196, 18 So. 339, 29 L. R. A. 416; ... Cooley, Taxation (2d Ed.) § 314. In Atlantic Coast Line R ... Co. v. Lakeland, on petition for rehearing, 94 Fla. 347, 115 ... So. 669, 686, ... funds in the State Treasury to the credit of the Public ... Free School Fund.' Wade v. Atlantic Lbr. Co., 51 ... Fla. 628, 41 So. 72 ... It ... necessarily follows that ... contrary to justify the courts in overthrowing the ... legislative judgment. Jackson Lumber Co. v. Walton ... County, 95 Fla. 632, 116 So. 771, Jordan v. Duval ... County, 68 Fla. 48, 66 ... ...
-
State Ex Rel. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. State Bd. of Equalizers
... ... of office, nor out of his official position, but because he ... was liable to be injured pecuniarily ... The ... cases of Wade v. Atlantic Lumber Co., 51 Fla. 628, ... 41 So. 72, and Disston v. Board of Trustees of Internal ... Improvement Fund of State of Florida, 75 ... ...