Wade v. State

Citation589 So.2d 322
Decision Date08 October 1991
Docket NumberNo. 91-295,91-295
PartiesKenneth Anthony WADE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. 589 So.2d 322, 16 Fla. L. Week. D2656
CourtCourt of Appeal of Florida (US)

PER CURIAM.

We grant the state's motion for rehearing, withdraw our opinion filed August 15, 1991, and substitute the following opinion, affirming the trial court's denial of appellant Wade's motion to suppress evidence.

The record indicates that Wade was charged by information with one count of possession of cocaine and one count of possession of drug paraphernalia. Wade filed a motion to suppress the physical evidence, and an evidentiary hearing was conducted in November 1990. Deputy G.E. Cummings testified for the state that he was part of a drug task force that was assigned to the Hilltop Apartment complex in North Jacksonville after the manager of the complex complained about people selling crack cocaine near the basketball court. On September 26, 1990, several task force members, including Deputy Cummings and Sgt. Bohn, arrived at the complex from four different directions. As Cummings arrived, Bohn "came across the radio and said 'Stop those guys right there.' " According to Cummings, he and Bohn were in the same line of sight at that point, both looking down a passageway between two buildings that led to the basketball court. Cummings testified that he "looked in the same direction he [Bohn] was looking and observed two individuals quickly walking out, looking behind them." Cummings testified that he approached the two individuals (appellant and Larry Magriff) and said, "Hold up, wait a minute." He then asked, "You got anything in your pockets?" Appellant said, "What do you want? I didn't do nothing," spun around quickly, reached into his pocket, and threw something toward a nearby wall. The object, a Tylenol bottle, hit the wall and fell to the ground seven or eight feet from Cummings. When Cummings asked appellant what was in the bottle, appellant denied having thrown it. The bottle was found to contain crack cocaine, and appellant was arrested.

On cross-examination, Cummings admitted that Bohn had given no description of the individuals he ordered stopped and stated that he (Cummings) had approached appellant and Magriff based solely on Bohn's radio-transmitted order. According to Cummings, appellant and Magriff were free to leave at the time he approached them.

Magriff testified that when Cummings approached them, he told them to "get on the wall" and put their hands up, "then came and told us to empty our pockets." Both appellant and Magriff put their wallets down, then were frisked by Cummings. Magriff stated that he "didn't know" if he was free to leave at the time Cummings approached them, but said that he "wasn't going to walk away" because Cummings had threatened to use his...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Thames v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 2 Enero 1992
    ...a mere submission to authority. As the trier of fact, it was the trial court's prerogative to determine this question, Wade v. State, 589 So.2d 322 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991), and the court's resolution of such matters should not be disturbed on appeal unless clearly erroneous. Jordan v. State, 38......
  • S.L.R. v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 7 Abril 1995
    ...a mere submission to authority. As the trier of fact, it was the trial court's prerogative to determine this question, Wade v. State, 589 So.2d 322 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991), and the court's resolution of such matters should not be disturbed on appeal unless clearly erroneous. Jordon v. State, 38......
  • D.E. v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 29 Septiembre 1992
    ...DCA 1992); State v. Hollinger, 596 So.2d 521 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992); State v. Wilson, 595 So.2d 1106 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Wade v. State, 589 So.2d 322 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); Butler v. State, 579 So.2d 890 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991) (no seizure where officers got out of their car and before they said any......
  • Currelley v. State, 91-3629
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 25 Marzo 1993
    ...for appellant. Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Wendy S. Morris, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee. PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. Wade v. State, 589 So.2d 322 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). ZEHMER, WOLF and KAHN, JJ., ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT