Waggaman v. Franklin Life Ins. Co., S95A0847
Decision Date | 13 July 1995 |
Docket Number | No. S95A0847,S95A0847 |
Citation | 458 S.E.2d 826,265 Ga. 565 |
Parties | WAGGAMAN v. FRANKLIN LIFE INS. CO. et al. |
Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
William S. Hardman, William S. Hardman, P.C., Gainesville, for Waggaman.
John F. Lyndon, Athens, James H. Fisher, II, Long, Weinberg, Ansley & Wheeler, Atlanta, for Franklin Life Ins.
While married to each other, appellant Michael Waggaman and appellee Mary Frances Langford applied for and received a policy of life insurance issued by appellee Franklin Life Insurance Company ("Franklin") on the life of Waggaman. When Waggaman and Langford divorced in October 1993, the settlement agreement incorporated into the judgment and decree of divorce awarded the Franklin life insurance policy on Waggaman's life to Langford. In July 1994, Waggaman filed suit against Langford and Franklin seeking, among other things, a declaratory judgment that he owned the insurance policy issued on his life by Franklin. The trial court granted Langford's motion for summary judgment on the ground that the doctrine of res judicata estopped appellant from litigating the issue of the ownership of the policy as that issue had been adjudicated in the divorce action. Waggaman filed this appeal from the grant of summary judgment to Langford.
1. OCGA § 9-12-40 provides that
[a] judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction shall be conclusive between the same parties and their privies as to all matters put in issue or which under the rules of law might have been put in issue in the cause wherein the judgment was rendered until the judgment is reversed or set aside.
A prior action may bar a subsequent action under the doctrine of res judicata if the prior action resulted in an adjudication by a court of competent jurisdiction and the two actions have an identity of parties and subject matter. Fowler v. Vineyard, 261 Ga. 454(1), 405 S.E.2d 678 (1991). Res judicata is an affirmative defense (OCGA § 9-11-8(c)) which must be established by the pleader. Glen Oak v. Henderson, 258 Ga. 455(2), 369 S.E.2d 736 (1988). To carry her burden of proof, Langford introduced a certified copy of the final judgment entered in the divorce action filed by Frances L. Waggaman against Michael A. Waggaman wherein the Superior Court of Hall County awarded "[t]he Franklin Life Insurance policy insuring the life of [Michael Waggaman]" to Frances Waggaman. Langford also submitted her affidavit in which she set forth that she was formerly married to appellant Waggaman, was formerly known as Frances Waggaman, and was divorced from appellant by the decree issued by the Superior Court of Hall County, the certified copy of which was attached. Appellant contends that res judicata does not bar his claim as there is no similarity of parties in this case and the divorce proceeding because the present action involves Franklin, which was not a party to the divorce action. Res judicata, however, does not require that all parties on the respective sides of litigation in both cases be identical, but only Gamble v. Gamble, 204 Ga. 82, 87, 48 S.E.2d 540 (1948). As Langford clearly showed that the proponent of the defense and the party against whom it was asserted were the parties engaged in the earlier action, the trial court did not err when it sustained the affirmative defense against the attack on identity of parties. Id.
3. Appellant also contends there is no similarity of issues in this case and the divorce proceeding. He asserts that equitable division of marital property was the issue in...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Ga. Power Co. v. Brandreth Farms, LLC.
...issue in the cause wherein the judgment was rendered until the judgment is reversed or set aside.").14 See Waggaman v. Franklin Life Ins. Co. , 265 Ga. 565 (1), 458 S.E.2d 826 (1995) ; Trejo-Valdez v. Associated Agents , 357 Ga. App. 461, 465 (1), 850 S.E.2d 863 (2020).15 We note that the f......
-
Metro Atlanta Task Force for the Homeless, Inc. v. Ichthus Cmty. Trust
...as to any future dispossessory actions between these parties while the case remains pending. See Waggaman v. Franklin Life Ins. Co., 265 Ga. 565, 458 S.E.2d 826 (1995) ("A prior action may bar a subsequent action under the doctrine of res judicata if the prior action resulted in an adjudica......
-
Johnson v. State
...issue and necessarily resolved in the defendant's favor at the first trial.” (citation omitted)). See also Waggaman v. Franklin Life Ins., 265 Ga. 565, 565, 458 S.E.2d 826 (1995) (affirming the grant of summary judgment on res judicata grounds where the appellee introduced sufficient certif......
-
The Ga. Power Co. v. Brandreth Farms, LLC
... ... situation which involves imminent and urgent peril to life ... and property. [ 35 ] In such instances, those ... aside.") ... [ 14 ] See Waggaman v. Franklin Life ... Ins. Co. , 265 Ga. 565 (1) (458 ... ...
-
Reluctance or Apathy? Examining Georgia's Continued Adherence to a Strict Mutuality Issue Preclusion Doctrine
...terms "collateral estoppel" and "res judicata" and the distinct elements of each doctrine. See, e.g., Waggaman v. Franklin Life Ins. Co., 458 S.E.2d 826, 827 (Ga. 1995) (applying an issue preclusion analysis but referring to it as "res judicata" throughout the opinion); see also, e.g., ALR ......