Waggoner v. Dodson
Decision Date | 23 October 1902 |
Citation | 69 S.W. 993 |
Parties | WAGGONER v. DODSON et al. |
Court | Texas Supreme Court |
W. W. Flood, for appellant. J. T. Montgomery and J. H. Barwise, Jr., for appellees.
This case comes to us from the court of civil appeals of the Second supreme judicial district upon a certificate of dissent. The opinion of the majority of the court makes the following statement of the case and of the point upon which the judges failed to agree: The dissenting opinion sets out the bill of exceptions, which is as follows: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial16 cases
-
White v. Teague
... ... Flowers, 74 Ark. 212, 85 S.W. 242; Cuero First Natl ... Bank v. San Antonio, etc., R. Co., 97 Tex. 201, 77 S.W ... 410; Waggoner v. Dodson, 96 Tex. 6, 68 S.W. 813, 69 ... S.W. 993; Hargrave v. Vaughn, 82 Tex. 112, 17 S.W ... 772; Sweeney v. Taylor, 41 Tex. Civ. App ... ...
-
American Ins. Co. v. Foutz & Bursum
...had the matter of peremptory challenges under consideration many times. In 1902 the case of Waggoner v. Dodson, 96 Tex. 6, 68 S.W. 813, 69 S.W. 993, was before the Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. In that case Waggoner sued James, Henderson, Kemp and M. and A. F. Dodson, that is, plaintiff ......
-
Gussett v. Nueces County
...and parties defendant asking judgment over against each other are within the rule. See Waggoner v. Dodson, 96 Tex. 6, 68 S. W. 813, 69 S. W. 993; National Bank v. S. A. & A. P. Ry. Co., 97 Tex. 201, 77 S. W. 410; Texas & Pacific R. Co. v. Stell, 61 S. W. 980; I. & G. N. v. Bingham 40 Tex. C......
-
Standard v. Texas Pacific Coal & Oil Co.
...Snow v. Starr, 75 Tex. 411, 12 S. W. 673; Wolf v. Perryman, 82 Tex. 116, 17 S. W. 772; Waggoner v. Dodson, 96 Tex. 7, 68 S. W. 813, 69 S. W. 993. In one statement and argument addressed to a number of different assignments of error, appellants complain of certain directions and instructions......
Request a trial to view additional results