Wayne Creasy Agency, Inc. v. Maillard, 90-2886
| Decision Date | 11 August 1992 |
| Docket Number | No. 90-2886,90-2886 |
| Citation | 604 So.2d 1235 |
| Parties | WAYNE CREASY AGENCY, INC., etc., Appellant, v. Eugene MAILLARD, et al., Appellees. 604 So.2d 1235, 17 Fla. L. Week. D1901 |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Martin & Associates, and C. Rabon Martin, Tulsa, Okl., and S. Curtis Kiser, Dunedin, for appellant.
Jamerson & Sutton, and John Sutton, Coral Gables, for appellees.
Before BARKDULL, NESBITT and BASKIN, JJ.
This appeal is from an order entered on final judgement wherein the trial court granted rescission of a contract to purchase a condominium unit. We reverse on the sole ground that the trial court denied the seller leave to amend its answer to include the equitable defense of laches.
On January 4, 1985, Wayne Creasy Agency, Inc. (seller) entered into a contract with Eugene Maillard, Jr. and his wife Patricia Lynch (buyers), to sell a one bedroom condominium unit, located on Marathon Key, Florida. The transaction closed on March 8, 1985, and by December of that year severe structural problems were discovered in the building where the unit was located.
In March 1987, the buyers filed suit against the seller, the Condominium Association, Schmitt Real Estate Company (Schmitt), Bradley Realty Company (Bradley), and the attorney who represented the buyers in their purchase of the unit. The buyers sought damages for negligence and negligent misrepresentation, as well as for breach of implied warranty of habitability and fitness. They also sought the equitable relief of rescission.
On September 13, 1990, the buyers moved to elect the remedy of rescission. See Feinberg v. Naile, 561 So.2d 1307 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990). The trial court dismissed both the attorney who had represented the buyers in the transaction and the Association based on the buyers' failure to state a cause of action against these parties; defendant Schmitt obtained a final summary judgment in its favor. The two remaining defendants, the seller and Bradley, both conceded that the buyers had a right to elect the remedy of rescission, and the court granted the buyers' motion. The result of this election of remedy was to effectively reduce the complaint against the seller to one count for rescission. The action against Bradley for negligence and negligent misrepresentation was stayed pending the outcome of the rescission suit.
On September 19, 1990, the seller moved for leave to amend its answer to include the defense of laches. On October 9, 1990, the day the non-jury trial began, the trial court denied the motion and, after one day of testimony, found that the seller's president had "negligently or fraudulently" concealed the existence of material defects in the property from the buyers. The trial court ordered the contract rescinded, and awarded additional monetary relief to the buyers as a means of restoring the parties to their pre-closing postures. On appeal, the seller claims that it was error for the court to deny it leave to amend its answer to include the equitable defense of laches. We agree and reverse the order under review.
Leave to amend a pleading may be freely given when justice so...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Carib Ocean Shipping, Inc. v. Armas
...of leave to amend answer to include defense of statute of frauds at close of evidence abuse of discretion); Wayne Creasy Agency, Inc. v. Maillard, 604 So.2d 1235 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992)(denial of leave to amend abuse of discretion where proffered amendment demonstrates successful cause of action......
-
Shoma Coral Gables, LLC v. Gables Inv. Holdings, LLC
...we review the trial court's denial of Shoma's motion for leave to amend for abuse of discretion. See Wayne Creasy Agency, Inc. v. Maillard, 604 So. 2d 1235, 1236 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992). Causes of Action for Breach of Contract Against the Investor and Colombo Because, according to its own terms,......
-
Port Marina Condo. Ass'n, Inc. v. Roof Servs., Inc.
...of discretion where the proffered amendment indicates that a plaintiff can state a cause of action.” Wayne Creasy Agency, Inc. v. Maillard, 604 So.2d 1235, 1236 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992). Here, Port Marina requested leave to amend in a motion for rehearing. Port Marina should be given leave to ame......
-
Cedar Mountain Estates v. Loan One, LLC., 5D07-3914.
...As such, the trial court abused its discretion in denying Cedar Mountain's motion to amend. See Wayne Creasy Agency, Inc. v. Maillard, 604 So.2d 1235, 1236 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992) (as long as the amended pleading states a cause of action or raises a proper defense, it is an abuse of discretion t......