Weatherred v. State
| Decision Date | 15 July 1998 |
| Docket Number | No. 474-98,474-98 |
| Parties | Jon David WEATHERRED, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. . En Banc |
| Court | Texas Court of Criminal Appeals |
Daniel W. Hurley, Aaron R. Clements, Lubbock, for appellant.
Gail Kikawa McConnell, Asst. Dist. Atty., Conroe, Matthew Paul, State's Atty., Austin, for State.
Before the court en banc.
OPINION ON STATE AND STATE PROSECUTING ATTORNEY'S PETITIONS
FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
Appellant was convicted of capital murder and his punishment was assessed at confinement for life. The Court of Appeals held the trial court erred in excluding expert testimony regarding photo bias and eyewitness identification, and reversed and remanded the case for a new trial. Weatherred v. State, 963 S.W.2d 115 (Tex.App.--Beaumont, 1998). The Montgomery County District Attorney (DA) and the State Prosecuting Attorney's Office (SPA) have both filed petitions for discretionary review.
In the DA's and SPA's first ground for review, it is alleged the Court of Appeals failed to address every issue raised and necessary to the final disposition of the appeal. Tex.R.App.P. 47.1. Specifically, the parties contend the Court of Appeals failed to address its claim that the trial court's exclusion of the expert witness' testimony could be upheld because the probative value of the testimony was substantially outweighed by its prejudicial effect. Tex.R.Crim.Evid. 403. If the trial court's decision to exclude evidence is correct on any theory of law applicable to the case, including Rule 403, it will be sustained. Smith v. State, 898 S.W.2d 838, 843 (Tex.Cr.App.1995). The State raised this claim in the Court of Appeals but it was not addressed.
The parties also contend the Court of Appeals did not perform a proper analysis of the admissibility of the expert testimony pursuant to Rule 702 of the Texas Rules of Criminal Evidence, and the criteria set out in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 113 S.Ct. 2786, 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993), and Kelly v. State, 824 S.W.2d 568 (Tex.Cr.App.1992). This Court recently set out the standard for admission of expert testimony in the "soft" sciences, that is, "fields of study aside from the hard sciences such as the social sciences or fields that are based primarily upon experience and training as opposed to the scientific method." Nenno v. State, 970 S.W.2d 549 (Tex.Cr.App.1998). The Court of Appeals did not have the benefit of that decision at the time it...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Hernandez v. State, No. 03-04-00356-CR (TX 1/26/2006)
...The trial court's rulings should be sustained on appeal if correct on any theory of law applicable to the case. Weatherred v. State, 975 S.W.2d 323, 323 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998). A trial court abuses its discretion when its decision was so clearly wrong as to lie outside that zone within whic......
-
Ex parte Taylor
...State, 993 S.W.2d 116, 116 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999); State v. Munoz, 991 S.W.2d 818, 821 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999); Weatherred v. State, 975 S.W.2d 323, 323-324 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998); Marin v. State, 925 S.W.2d 720, 721 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996); Ray v. State, 919 S.W.2d 125, 129 & 129 n. 2 (Tex. ......
-
Shugart v. State, 10-98-206-CR
...of appellate review also applies when the court excludes evidence which the defendant offers into evidence. See Weatherred v. State, 975 S.W.2d 323, 323 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998) (If the trial court's decision to exclude evidence is correct on any theory of law applicable to the case, includin......
-
Roise v. State
...Id. The foregoing has been described as the standard for admission of expert testimony in the "soft" sciences. See Weatherred v. State, 975 S.W.2d 323 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998). In Gammill v. Jack Williams Chevrolet, Inc., 972 S.W.2d 713 (Tex. 1998), a result similar to that of Nenno was reach......
-
Navigating expert reliability: are criminal standards of certainty being left on the dock?
...on the occasion in question'") (quoting Jordan v. State, 928 S.W.2d 550, 554 n.5 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996)). (135) See Weatherred v. State, 975 S.W.2d 323, 324 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998) (vacating the decision of the Texas Court of Appeals and remanding the case to that court for reconsideration i......