Webb v. Murphy
| Decision Date | 31 May 1977 |
| Docket Number | No. 53892,No. 2,53892,2 |
| Citation | 236 S.E.2d 840,142 Ga.App. 649 |
| Parties | W. L. WEBB v. R. F. MURPHY |
| Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
Gilbert & Bone, Aubrey W. Gilbert, James H. Bone, Carrollton, for appellant.
Greene, Buckley, DeRieux & Jones, Daniel A. Angelo, Alfred B. Adams, III, Atlanta, for appellee.
The plaintiff brought a complaint against the defendant seeking recovery of damages for injuries received in an automobile collision which occurred on June 12, 1974. The complaint was filed on June 10, 1976 just before the two-year statute of limitation on personal injuries ran. Code § 3-1004 as amended (Ga.L.1964, p. 763). Service of the complaint was had on August 5, 1976.
The defendant moved to dismiss the complaint because it was barred by the statute of limitation. The motion duly came on for hearing and was sustained by the trial judge, who dismissed the plaintiff's complaint. Appeal followed. Held :
The general rule is: "If the filing of the petition is followed by timely service perfected as required by law, although the statute of limitation runs between the date of the filing of the petition and the date of service, the service will relate back to the time of filing so as to avoid the limitation." Hilton v. Maddox etc., Trim Contractors, 125 Ga.App. 423, 425, 188 S.E.2d 167, 169, and cases therein cited. Where service is belatedly perfected, the trial court may dismiss the action when the delay was caused by laches on the plaintiff's part. Service must proceed with diligence if the statute of limitation is to be tolled by the filing of the action. Railey v. State Farm, 129 Ga.App. 875, 880(2), 201 S.E.2d 628.
As we held in Childs v. Catlin, 134 Ga.App. 778, 781, 216 S.E.2d 360, 362: "the correct test must be whether the plaintiff showed that he acted in a reasonable and diligent manner in attempting to insure that a proper service was made as quickly as possible." The trial judge must determine, exercising a legal discretion, whether the plaintiff was diligent in his efforts. Hutchins v. Hunter, 135 Ga.App. 40, 41, 217 S.E.2d 375. Accord: McNeal v. Able, 135 Ga.App. 702, 218 S.E.2d 460; Clarkson Industries, Inc. v. Price, 135 Ga.App. 787, 218 S.E.2d 921.
Here the trial judge heard argument and considered the affidavits filed. Based thereon he found, in his discretion, that defendant's motion should be granted. Although excuses were offered, we can not hold that the...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Giles v. State Farm Mut. Ins. Co.
...at 837, 462 S.E.2d 713 ; Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Fulcher, 128 Ga.App. 606, 609(3), 197 S.E.2d 416 (1973) ; Webb v. Murphy, 142 Ga.App. 649, 650, 236 S.E.2d 840 (1977). Therefore, if service is made within the five-day1 grace period allowed by OCGA § 9–11–4(c), it relates back to the da......
-
Lau v. Klinger
...of filing only if the plaintiff "diligently attempted to perfect service." Cambridge Mutual, 720 F.2d at 1233; Webb v. Murphy, 142 Ga.App. 649, 236 S.E.2d 840, 841 (1977); Bible v. Hughes, 146 Ga.App. 769, 247 S.E.2d 584, 585 (1978); Childs v. Catlin, 134 Ga.App. 778, 216 S.E.2d 360, 361-63......
-
McAndrew v. Lockheed Martin Corp., 97-8483
...service. See O.C.G.A. § 9-11-4; Cambridge Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. Claxton, 720 F.2d 1230, 1232 (11th Cir.1983); Webb v. Murphy, 142 Ga.App. 649, 236 S.E.2d 840, 841 (1977). To perfect service under Georgia law, the plaintiff must either personally serve defendants or obtain a waiver of person......
-
Cambridge Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. City of Claxton, Ga.
...of limitations has run, service will relate back only if the plaintiff diligently attempted to perfect service. Webb v. Murphy, 142 Ga.App. 649, 236 S.E.2d 840, 841 (1977); Bible v. Hughes, 146 Ga.App. 769, 770, 247 S.E.2d 584, 585 (1978); Hilton, 125 Ga.App. at 426, 188 S.E.2d at By holdin......