Weber v. Levitt

Decision Date06 June 1974
Parties, 316 N.E.2d 327 In the Matter of Joseph P. WEBER, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, Appellants, v. Arthur LEVITT, as Comptroller of the State of New York and Administrator of the New York State Policemen's and Firemen's Retirement System, Respondent. In the Matter of Edward LECCI, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, Appellants, v. Arthur LEVITT, as Comptroller of the State of New York and Administrator of the New York State Policemen's and Firemen's Retirement System, Respondent. In the Matter of Daniel GREENWALD, Individually and as Representative of the Nassau County Patrolmen's Benevolent Association, Appellant, v. Arthur LEVITT, as Comptroller of the State of New York and Administrator of the New York State Policemen's and Firemen's Retirement System, Respondent.
CourtNew York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals

Allen R. Morganstern and Richard Hartman, Mineola, for appellants.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Atty. Gen. (John Q. Driscoll and Ruth Kessler Toch, Albany, of counsel), for respondent.

MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division, 41 A.D.2d 452, 344 N.Y.S.2d 381, in each of the three proceedings should be affirmed, without costs, on the opinion of Mr. Justice Louis M. Greenblott at the Appellate Division. Termination pay, although includible in the 'final average salary' for pension purposes, was properly limited to that portion attributable to the last three years of service. The Appellate Division correctly interpreted the limited effect of Kranker v. Levitt, 30 N.Y.2d 574, 330 N.Y.S.2d 791, 281 N.E.2d 840, as creating a vested right to inclusion only if based on administrative construction and practice for a 'given' or extended period of time, and then, only to the extent reasonable (see Matter of Hessel v. New York City Employees' Retirement System, 33 N.Y.2d 381, 385, 353 N.Y.S.2d 169, 172, 308 N.E.2d 688, 689). Hence, vacation pay was limited to 30 days as was done in the Kranker case; and unused sick leave credits were wholly excluded as neither warranted by law nor administrative construction (see Retirement and Social Security Law, § 431, Consol.Laws, c. 51--A).

BREITEL, C.J., and JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, SAMUEL RABIN and STEVENS, JJ., concur in memorandum.

In each case: Order affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
20 cases
  • Kraus v. Board of Trustees of Police Pension Fund of Village of Niles
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • May 22, 1979
    ... ... Levitt ... Page 1290 ... [28 Ill.Dec. 700] (Sup.Ct.1976), 84 Misc.2d 903, 377 N.Y.S.2d 962.) ...         Thus, in Birnbaum the plaintiffs ... See also Kranker v. Levitt (1972), 30 N.Y.2d 574, 330 N.Y.S.2d 791, 281 N.E.2d 840; Weber v. Levitt (1973), 41 A.D.2d 452, 344 N.Y.S.2d 381, Aff'd (1974), 34 N.Y.2d 797, 359 N.Y.S.2d 39, 316 N.E.2d 327, Cert. denied, 419 U.S. 997, 95 S.Ct ... ...
  • Lippman v. Board of Educ. of the Sewanhaka Cent. High School Dist.
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • November 26, 1985
    ...within the contemplation of the 'contracting parties' would never be subject to retroactive modification"); Matter of Weber v. Levitt, 34 N.Y.2d 797, 359 N.Y.S.2d 39, 316 N.E.2d 327 affg. 41 A.D.2d 452, 344 N.Y.S.2d 381, in relation to final average salary for pension purposes; Matter of Do......
  • Bohlen v. DiNapoli
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • February 13, 2020
    ...and practice for a ‘given’ or extended period of time, and then, only to the extent reasonable" ( Matter of Weber v. Levitt , 34 N.Y.2d 797, 800, 359 N.Y.S.2d 39, 316 N.E.2d 327 [1974] ). Here, as the Appellate Division dissent noted, petitioners have failed to show a pre–1971 practice of i......
  • Bohlen v. DiNapoli, 525823
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • August 9, 2018
    ...practice or policy including like compensation that preceded the enactment of the statute ( Matter of Weber v. Levitt, 34 N.Y.2d 797, 800, 359 N.Y.S.2d 39, 316 N.E.2d 327 [1974] ; see Matter of Hessel v. New York City Employees' Retirement Sys., 33 N.Y.2d 381, 385, 353 N.Y.S.2d 169, 308 N.E......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT