Welch v. Morse
Decision Date | 15 September 1948 |
Court | United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court |
Parties | E. SOHIER WELCH & another, trustees, v. CABOT JACKSON MORSE, JUNIOR, & others. |
May 4, 1948.
Present: QUA, C.
J., LUMMUS, DOLAN SPALDING, & WILLIAMS, JJ.
Power, Devise and Legacy, Power. Trust, Trust created by donee of power.
An exercise of a power to appoint property is not invalid merely because it is partial and does not exhaust the power.
Under a will establishing a trust and directing that at the death of the survivor of a group of income beneficiaries, including a nephew of the testatrix, the trustee should "transfer and pay over . . . [a part of the trust fund] to the use of the wife and issue" of the nephew "as he may by will have appointed; provided" that, if the nephew's wife had been living at the death of the testatrix, he should "appoint to her no larger interest" in the appointive property "than a right to the income during her life," a provision in the will of the nephew, who had died leaving a wife and son surviving, appointing to his wife, who had been living at the death of the testatrix, the income of all the appointive property during her life, but not otherwise dealing with that property, constituted a valid partial exercise of the power; all the group of income beneficiaries having died, the appointive property must be held for administration by the same trustee for the benefit of the nephew's wife during her life, and its ultimate disposition left to be determined by future events.
PETITION, filed in the Probate Court for the county of Essex on August 4, 1947.
The case was heard by Phelan, J. R. M. Robinson, stated the case.
T. L. Gannon, (F.
X. Ahearn with him,) for the respondent Cabot Jackson Morse, Jr.
R. G. Dodge, for the respondent Anna Braden Morse. J. M. Woolsey, Jr., for Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
H. T. Davis & J.
D. Merriam, for Museum of Fine Arts; and J.
M. Russell, for President and Fellows of Harvard College, submitted a brief.
This is a petition by the successor trustees under the will of Marian Hovey for instructions as to the disposition of a trust fund created by her will.
The testatrix died in 1898 leaving a brother, Henry S. Hovey, a sister, Fannie H. Morse, and two nephews, Cabot Jackson Morse and John Torrey Morse, 3d. By article seventh of her will she gave her residuary estate to trustees to pay the income to these relatives in such manner that, in the events that actually happened, Cabot Jackson Morse, the survivor of the group ultimately became entitled to the entire income during his life. By the same article the testatrix made the following disposition at the death of the survivor:
While the clause just quoted purported to dispose of the property of which the testatrix had a power to dispose under the will of her late father, George O. Hovey, it was agreed that the petitioners have never received any property under that will and that the fund now before the court comprises only property owned by the testatrix individually.
The brother and the sister of the testatrix died respectively in 1900 and 1922. The nephew John Torrey Morse, 3d, died in 1928, never having married and leaving no issue. After his death the other nephew, Cabot Jackson Morse, received all the income of the trust fund until his death on August 21, 1946. He was survived by a widow, Anna Braden Morse, who was born prior to the death of the testatrix, and by a son, Cabot Jackson Morse, Junior, who was his sole issue. He left a will, the material portions of which are as follows:
The petitioners asked for instructions with respect to the following questions: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Sessions' Estate, In re
...104, 108; Old Colony Trust Co. v. Richardson, 1937, 297 Mass. 147, 7 N.E.2d 432, 434, 121 A.L.R. 1218; Welch v. Morse, 1948, 323 Mass. 233, 81 N.E.2d 361, 363, 4 A.L.R.2d 913; De Charette v. De Charette, 1936, 264 Ky. 525, 94 S.W.2d 1018, 1021, 104 A.L.R. 1455; 3 Restatement, supra, 1995, §......
-
Spencer's Estate, In re
...44 Misc.2d 929, 255 N.Y.S.2d 419, 422 (1965) (relying on a statute); Busch v. Dozier, 375 S.W.2d 27, 33 (Mo.1964); Welch v. Morse, 323 Mass. 233, 81 N.E.2d 361, 363 (1948); Parker v. MacBryde, 4 Cir., 132 F.2d 932, 938, Cert. denied 318 U.S. 779, 63 S.Ct. 859, 87 L.Ed. 1147 (1943); Old Colo......
-
Loring v. Karri-Davies
...Hooper case, and the latter case therfore was expressly stated to be distinguishable from those cases. The issue in Welch v. Morse, 323 Mass. 233, 81 N.E.2d 361 (1948), was the validity of the partial exercise of a special power of appointment, and that case therfore is inapposite to the pr......
- Welch v. Morse