Wells Fargo Bank, Na v. Chaplin
Decision Date | 11 August 2009 |
Docket Number | 2007-11821.,2008-08480. |
Citation | 884 N.Y.S.2d 254,65 A.D.3d 588,2009 NY Slip Op 06179 |
Parties | WELLS FARGO BANK, NA, Respondent, v. YVONNE CHAPLIN, Appellant et al., Defendants. |
Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the appellant.
The burden of proving that personal jurisdiction has been acquired over a defendant in an action rests with the plaintiff (see Bankers Trust Co. of Cal. v Tsoukas, 303 AD2d 343 [2003]; Bank of Am. Natl. Trust & Sav. Assn. v Herrick, 233 AD2d 351 [1996]; Frankel v Schilling, 149 AD2d 657, 659 [1989]). Ordinarily, a process server's affidavit of service establishes a prima facie case as to the method of service and, therefore, gives rise to a presumption of proper service (see Household Fin. Realty Corp. of N.Y. v Brown, 13 AD3d 340 [2004]; Bankers Trust Co. of Cal. v Tsoukas, 303 AD2d at 344; Frankel v Schilling, 149 AD2d 657, 659 [1989]; see also New Is. Invs. v Wynne, 251 AD2d 560 [1998]). However, where there is a sworn denial that a defendant was served with process, the affidavit of service is rebutted, and the plaintiff must establish jurisdiction at a hearing by a preponderance of the evidence (see Mortgage Access Corp. v Webb, 11 AD3d 592, 593 [2004]; Bankers Trust Co. of Cal. v Tsoukas, 303 AD2d at 344; Kingsland Group v Pose, 296 AD2d 440 [2002]; Balancio v Santorelli, 267 AD2d 189 [1999]; New Is. Invs. v Wynne, 251 AD2d 560 [1998]; Bank of Am. Natl. Trust & Sav. Assn. v Herrick, 233 AD2d at 352).
Here, the plaintiff allegedly effected service upon the appellant pursuant to CPLR 308 (2) on April 23, 2007 by delivering the summons and complaint to a person of suitable age and discretion, who was identified as Marilyn Matheson, at the appellant's residence in Queens. In support of her motion, in effect, to vacate her default in appearing or answering the complaint, the appellant submitted an affidavit from Matheson averring that the summons and complaint had never been delivered to her, and that she was in Pawling, New York, in April 2007. Although Matheson's affidavit did not specify that she was in Pawling on April 23, 2007 when process allegedly was delivered to her in Queens, the appellant submitted additional evidence to substantiate her claim that Matheson was in...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
OneWest Bank FSB v. Perla
... ... Division, First Department, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v ... Gore (162 A.D.3d 437) and B.N. Realty Assoc. v ... internal quotation marks omitted]; see Wells Fargo Bank, ... NA v Chaplin , 65 A.D.3d 588, 589). A presumption is a ... rule that requires courts to draw a certain ... ...
-
OneWest Bank FSB v. Perla
...NA v. Tobing, 175 A.D.3d 745, 747, 107 N.Y.S.3d 89 [emphasis added; internal quotation marks omitted]; see Wells Fargo Bank, NA v. Chaplin, 65 A.D.3d 588, 589, 884 N.Y.S.2d 254 ). A presumption is a rule that requires courts to draw a certain inference "unless and until the truth of such in......
-
Aurora Loan Servs., LLC v. Gaines
...Friedman, 90 A.D.3d 608, 609, 934 N.Y.S.2d 436;Washington Mut. Bank v. Holt, 71 A.D.3d 670, 897 N.Y.S.2d 148;Wells Fargo Bank, NA v. Chaplin, 65 A.D.3d 588, 589, 884 N.Y.S.2d 254;Roberts v. Anka, 45 A.D.3d 752, 753, 846 N.Y.S.2d 280;Bankers Trust Co. of Cal. v. Tsoukas, 303 A.D.2d 343, 756 ......
-
Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. v. Cigna
...to a presumption of proper service ( see US Bank N.A. v Ramos , 153 A.D.3d 882, 884, 60 NYS 3d 345 [2017] ; Wells Fargo Bank, NA v Chaplin , 65 A.D.3d 588, 589, 884 NYS 2d 254 [2009] ). "A mere conclusory denial of service is insufficient to rebut the presumption of proper service arising f......