Wells v. Mackay Telegraph-Cable Co.
Decision Date | 17 December 1921 |
Docket Number | (No. 8082.)<SMALL><SUP>*</SUP></SMALL> |
Citation | 239 S.W. 1001 |
Parties | WELLS et al. v. MACKAY TELEGRAPH-CABLE CO. |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Appeal from Harris County Court; John W. Lewis, Judge.
Suit by the Mackay Telegraph-Cable Company against L. W. Wells and others. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants appeal. Affirmed. Motion to certify overruled.
Stevens & Stevens, of Houston, Smith & Crawford, of Beaumont, and W. E. Masterson, of New York City, for appellants.
Andrews, Streetman, Logue & Mobley, W. L. Cook, M. E. Kurth, and E. J. Fountain, Jr., all of Houston, for appellee.
This suit was brought by appellee against L. W. Wells and eight others, all of whom are shareholders in the Noble Oil & Refining Company, to recover the sum of $585 due the appellee by said company for services rendered in the transmission of telegraphic messages for the company.
By its first amended original petition upon which the cause was tried plaintiff alleged in substance that prior to July, 1918, the defendants had associated themselves together in an organization or association known as the Noble Oil & Refining Company, there being a number of other persons in like manner members of said organization or association not made parties to the suit, and that each member of said association received individual certificates issued by the duly authorized agent and representative of the association evidencing their respective memberships therein. The petition further alleged that, having become members of said organization, and under and by virtue of a declaration of trust, defendants, and each of them, jointly and severally, constituted T. J. Noble, W. A. Kuhleman, and F. Hildebrand as each of their agents in the conduct and management of the affairs of said enterprise, as is more fully shown by copies of two declarations of trust attached as exhibits to the petition.
Plaintiff further alleged in the alternative that, if it be mistaken in its allegation that the defendants became members of said organization, and if the defendants were not principals with said agents acting as above alleged, then, and in that event the defendants were partners doing business under the said trade-name above set forth.
Defendants answered by a plea in abatement, the nature of which will be hereinafter shown, and by general denial and special denial under oath of any partnership relation or liability. The plea in abatement was overruled, and upon a trial by a jury the court instructed the jury to return a verdict for the plaintiff, and, such verdict being returned, judgment was rendered accordingly.
The two instruments under which the Noble Oil & Refining Company was organized and its business carried on are attached as exhibits to plaintiff's petition. The first of these instruments, which was executed on the 22d day of May, 1917, by T. J. Noble, W. E. Scott, and W. A. Kuhleman, in its first paragraph recites that T. J. Noble is the owner of oil leases, options, etc., and desires to convey such interests to W. E. Scott, W. A. Kuhleman, and T. J. Noble as trustees, and that they should employ a manager of said properties thereafter acquired, and agrees to divide the beneficial interest therein into shares.
The second paragraph is a declaration that the three named men will hold such property for the benefit of the holders of these shares of stock.
The third paragraph names this association as "The Noble Oil & Refining Company."
The fourth paragraph provides that the trustees named shall hold office until the first annual meeting of the shareholders on June 1, 1918.
Paragraph 5 reads as follows:
Paragraph 6 provides for the acceptance by new trustees of the trust given them by a written instrument.
Paragraph 7 authorizes the trustees to engage in the business of acquiring, buying, selling, and developing oil lands, and refining oil and in any business similar in character thereto which the trustees may deem expedient.
Paragraph 8 gives the trustees the legal title to all property and control thereof.
Paragraph 9 reads as follows:
The tenth paragraph provides that, as far as strangers to the trust are concerned, a resolution of the trustees authorizing a particular act to be done shall be conclusive evidence in favor of strangers that such act is within the power of the trustee.
Paragraph 11 provides for meeting of trustees.
Paragraph 12 gives the trustees power to make, adopt, amend, or repeal such by-laws, rules, and regulations not inconsistent with the terms of the instrument.
Paragraph 13 gives the trustees power to elect annually from their number officers of such association, and then the following:
"The president, treasurer, and secretary shall have the authority and perform the duties usually incident to those officers in the case of corporations, so far as applicable thereto, and shall have such other authority and perform such other duties as may from time to time be determined by the trustees."
The sixteenth and seventeenth paragraphs provide for the acquisition of shares by trustees and the amount of the beneficial interest and number of shares.
The eighteenth and nineteenth paragraphs provide that certificates of stock may be issued and that such shall be transferable.
The twentieth paragraph provides for dividends to be paid.
Paragraphs 22 to 29, inclusive, read as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State ex rel. Knox, Atty. Gen. v. Edward Hines Lumber Co.
...248. New York.--Bartley v. Andrews, 22 N.Y.S. 227. Texas.--Bingham v. Graham, 220 S.W. 1; Davis v. Hodgins, 225 S.W. 73; Wells v. McKay Tel. Cable Co., 239 S.W. 1001; Moss v. Republic Supply Co., 240 S.W. 326; v. Lucky Pat Oil & Gas Co., 241 S.W. 105, modifying on other grounds 230 S.W. 858......
-
Burk-Waggoner Oil Ass'n v. Hopkins
... ... 150 S.W. 224; Fisheries Co. et al. v. McCoy ... (Tex.Civ.App.) 202 S.W. 343; Wells v. Mackay ... Telegraph Co. (Tex.Civ.App.) 239 S.W. 1001; Hardee ... v. Adams Oil Assn ... ...
-
Continental Supply Co. v. Adams
...220 S. W. 105; Davis v. Hudgins (Tex. Civ. App.) 225 S. W. 73; Nini v. Cravens & Cage (Tex. Civ. App.) 253 S. W. 582. In Wells v. Mackay Telegraph Co., 239 S. W. 1001, the Galveston Court of Civil Appeals held that the shareholders were jointly and severally liable for the debts incurred by......
-
Greco v. Nat'l Football League
...are designed to directly funnel money to businesses or to increase overall revenues by promoting trade. See Wells v. Mackay Tel.-Cable Co., 239 S.W. 1001, 1007 (Tex.Civ.App.-Galveston 1921, no writ) (categorizing a trust as for-profit because its purpose was "the buying, selling, and develo......