Wendt v. Holbrook-Blackwelder Real Estate Trust Co.
Decision Date | 04 October 1927 |
Docket Number | No. 19767.,19767. |
Citation | 299 S.W. 66 |
Parties | WENDT v. HOLBROOK-BLACKWELDER REAL ESTATE TRUST CO. et al. |
Court | Missouri Court of Appeals |
Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court; Anthony F. Ittner, Judge.
"Not to be officially published."
Action by Fred J. Wendt against the Holbrook-Blackwelder Real Estate Trust Company and another. From a judgment for plaintiff, named defendant appeals. Affirmed.
Banister, Leonard, Sibley & McRoberts, of St. Louis, for appellant.
Mark D. Eagleton, John F. Clancy, Fred Berthold, and Harry S. Rooks, all of St. Louis, for respondent.
This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff in a collision between an automobile in which he was riding and a Stutz touring car driven by defendant James A. Houchin. The trial, with a jury, resulted in a verdict in favor of plaintiff against both defendants for $2,500. The defendant Holbrook-Blackwelder Real Estate Trust Company appeals.
The collision occurred on Washington avenue just east of Sarah street in the city of St. Louis. That the facts were sufficient to warrant a finding that the collision resulted from the negligence of defendant Houchin appears not to be questioned.
The only questions involved here are as to whether or not the relation existing between the defendants was such that defendant Holbrook-Blackwelder Real Estate Trust Company may be held liable for the negligence of defendant Houchin under the rule of respondeat superior, and the rulings of the court on the instructions relative to that issue. Some time in June, 1923, at which time and for a long time prior thereto defendant Holbrook-Blackwelder Real Estate Trust Company was a real estate broker engaged in buying, selling, renting, and leasing real estate on commission in the city of St. Louis, the defendants entered into a written contract, whereby it was agreed between them as follows:
It is contended by the defendant Holbrook-Blackwelder Real Estate Trust Company that at the time of the accident which resulted in plaintiff's injury, defendant Houchin was engaged in work provided for under the provisions of section 11 of the contract, and that as to such work defendant Houchin was an independent contractor, and that therefore the defendant Holbrook-Blackwelder Real Estate Trust Company is not liable for his tortious acts while engaged in such work....
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Coul v. George B. Peck Dry Goods Co.
... ... 580; Semper v. Amer ... Press, 273 S.W. 186; Wendt v. Real Estate Trust ... Co., 299 S.W. 66; Aubuchon v ... ...
-
Margulis v. National Enameling & Stamping Co.
... ... Garvin, 272 S.W. (Mo. App.) 108; Wendt v ... Holbrook-Blackwelder, 299 S.W. 66; Hoelker v ... ...
-
Margulis v. Natl. Enameling & Stamping Co.
...S.W. 930, 201 Mo. App. 349; Koelling v. Fuel & Ice Co., 267 S.W. (Mo. App.) 34; Burgess v. Garvin, 272 S.W. (Mo. App.) 108; Wendt v. Holbrook-Blackwelder, 299 S.W. 66; Hoelker v. American Press, 296 S.W. 1008. (2) On cross-examination, a witness may be compelled to answer any questions whic......
- Tebbe v. Tebbe