West American Ins. Co. v. Lovett

Decision Date24 December 1987
Docket NumberNo. 87-755,87-755
Citation13 Fla. L. Weekly 2,519 So.2d 39
Parties13 Fla. L. Weekly 2 WEST AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. Joy M. LOVETT, etc., Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

J. David Walsh of Cameron, Marriott, Walsh & Hodges, P.A., Daytona Beach, for appellant.

Anthony I. Provitola, P.A., Deland, for appellee.

COWART, Judge.

James Aaron Lovett, Jr., was operating, with permission of the owner, a pickup truck with uninsured motorist (UM) coverage on a highway when he came upon and passed the scene of a hit-and-run accident involving a wrecked bicycle and a fatally injured bicyclist. The pickup truck ran over bicycle debris, some of which became imbedded in the pickup truck tires. Mr. Lovett stopped the pickup truck off the highway about two hundred feet past the hit-and-run accident scene, got out of the pickup truck, and had walked about one hundred feet on the grass alongside the highway back toward the injured bicyclist when Mr. Lovett was himself struck and fatally injured by an uninsured motor vehicle which had swerved off the road to avoid the bicycle wreckage.

Appellee, Mr. Lovett's personal representative, brought a law action against appellant insurer claiming Mr. Lovett's estate and dependents were entitled to UM coverage benefits under the owner's insurance policy on the pickup truck. On the stipulated facts, the trial court found for the personal representative and against the insurer, which insurer appeals. We reverse.

Because Mr. Lovett was not a family member residing with the owner of the pickup truck, 1 the UM policy provided Mr. Lovett coverage only if he were a person "occupying" the covered vehicle. On the stipulated facts, as a matter of law, Lovett was not occupying the pickup truck at the time of the accident causing his bodily injuries and death. See, e.g., Davis v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co., 463 So.2d 1191 (Fla. 2d DCA), rev. denied, 471 So.2d 43 (Fla.1985); State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Yanes, 447 So.2d 945 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); Velasquez v. American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Co., 387 So.2d 427 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Fischer v. Aetna Insurance Co., 65 Misc.2d 191, 317 N.Y.S.2d 669, affirmed, 37 A.D.2d 917, 325 N.Y.S.2d 1012 (1971).

The personal representative urges that Mr. Lovett was obligated by statute to stop and render aid to the injured bicyclist, and that this court therefore should find Lovett to have been occupying the pickup truck while he walked back towards the bicyclist in discharge of his duty. See §§ 316.027 and 316.062(1), Fla.Stat. We reject this argument. The fact some of the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Spencer v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Corp.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of Indiana
    • August 9, 2005
    ...side of caution, would assume he might have been "involved," and would pull over to assist. New Hampshire cites West American Ins. Co. v. Lovett, 519 So.2d 39 (Fla.App.1987), for the proposition that a vehicle that merely drives over debris from an earlier accident is not "involved" in the ......
  • Genthner v. Progressive Cas. Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • Maine Supreme Court
    • August 22, 1996
    ...residence, the court concluded that he intended to first retrieve these items and then enter the car.); West American Ins. Co. v. Lovett, 519 So.2d 39, 40 (Fla.App., 5 Dist., 1987) (Driver of borrowed vehicle who pulled over to assist fatally injured biker involved in an accident with anoth......
  • Auto-Owners Ins. v. Above All Roofing, LLC
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • January 13, 2006
    ...Florida decision that would expand UM coverage as broadly as urged by the Loskots and Above All Roofing. But see West Am. Ins. Co. v. Lovett, 519 So.2d 39 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987) (considering claimant's argument for UM benefits based on compliance with sections 316.027 and 316.062(1), where uni......
  • Alamo Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. Hayward
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • November 14, 2003
    ...uninsured motorist coverage to "anyone ... occupying a covered auto" was upheld. Similarly, this court in West American Insurance Company v. Lovett, 519 So.2d 39 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987), review denied, 525 So.2d 879 (Fla.1988), approved a coverage provision limiting UM coverage to a person occu......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT