White v. State

Decision Date26 September 1950
Citation47 So.2d 863
PartiesWHITE v. STATE.
CourtFlorida Supreme Court

D. C. Laird, Lakeland, and Marvin B. Woods, Lakeland, for appellant.

Richard W. Ervin, Attorney General, and Reeves Bowen, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

CHAPMAN, Justice.

The County Solicitor of Polk County, Florida, filed an information consisting of seven counts against the appellant, Homer White, charging him with lottery violations. He was placed on trial before a jury in the Criminal Court of Record of said County and acquitted by the jury's verdict on six counts, but found guilty under the 7th count. The trial court denied a motion for a new trial, adjudged the appellant White guilty under the 7th count of the information and sentenced him to pay a fine of $500, and in default thereof that he be confined in the State Prison at hard labor for a period of one year. From this judgment White appealed.

Adduced into evidence, over seasonable objections of counsel for the defendant-appellant, were described bolita tickets obtained in the appellant's place of business at Bartow. These tickets were obtained as a result of a search warrant and seized by the searching officer in the appellant's place of business. Counsel for the appellant objected to the introduction of the bolita tickets into evidence on the ground that they were not constitutionally obtained--in that the affidavit and search warrant under which the search and seizure were made failed to conform to our Federal and State Constitutions, applicable statutes, and adjudications of the Supreme Court of Florida and of the Supreme Court of the United States. Likewise, motions to suppress were made by appellant's counsel during the progress of the trial but were denied by the trial court.

The affidavit for the search warrant is viz.: 'Before me, Glen Darty, Justice of the Peace in and for the Third District for Polk County, State of Florida, personally appeared James F. Whidden, a Sheriff's Deputy, of Polk County, who being by me first duly sworn, deposes and says that he believes and has good reason to believe that in a certain building known as White's Feed Store, 165 South Wilson Avenue, Bartow, Polk County, Florida, gambling and sale of lottery tickets, commonly known as and called 'Bolita', is being conducted by a person or persons whose names are to affiant unknown, contrary to the laws of the State of Florida; and that the said premises are being used for the operation of a...

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • Halverson v. Hardcastle
    • United States
    • Nevada Supreme Court
    • July 27, 2007
    ...the federal constitution, to the established law of the land, and, if a state judiciary, to the state constitution." (citing White v. State, 47 So.2d 863 (Fla. 1950); Petition of Florida State Bar Ass'n, 40 So.2d 902 (Fla.1949); People v. Spegal, 5 Ill.2d 211, 125 N.E.2d 468 (1955); People ......
  • Ramsey v. City of N. Las Vegas
    • United States
    • Nevada Supreme Court
    • April 13, 2017
    ...law of the land, and, if a state judiciary, the state constitution." 16 C.J.S. Constitutional Law § 387 (2016) (citing White v. State, 47 So.2d 863 (Fla. 1950) ; Petition of Florida State Bar Ass'n, 40 So.2d 902 (Fla. 1949) ; People v. Spegal, 5 Ill.2d 211, 125 N.E.2d 468 (1955) ; People v.......
  • Rodriguez v. State
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • June 26, 1974
    ...Second District Court of Appeal, reported at 284 So.2d 1 (1973), and the cases of Borrego v. State, 62 So.2d 43 (Fla, 1952); White v. State, 47 So.2d 863 (Fla.1950); and Hamelmann v. State, 113 So.2d 394 (Fla.App.1st Petitioners were convicted of aiding and assisting in the conducting of a ......
  • State v. Lewis
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • June 27, 1969
    ...held that the search warrant issued pursuant to this affidavit was invalid and cited Borrego v. State, Fla.1952, 62 So.2d 43; White v. State, Fla.1950, 47 So.2d 863; and Shaw v. State, Fla.1951, 53 So.2d 772, as The rule applied in each of those cases was that the affidavit must 'state fact......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT