White v. State
| Decision Date | 28 June 1940 |
| Docket Number | No. 20188.,20188. |
| Citation | 141 S.W.2d 951 |
| Parties | WHITE v. STATE. |
| Court | Texas Court of Criminal Appeals |
The judgment of conviction was affirmed on March 22, 1939. Tex.Cr.App., 128 S.W. 2d 51. Motion for rehearing was overruled May 17, 1939. Appellant made application to the Supreme Court of the United States for writ of certiorari to review the action of this Court. On November 13, 1939 the said Supreme Court of the United States denied the writ, 308 U.S. 608, 60 S.Ct. 170, 84 L.Ed. ___, and certified its action to this Court whereupon the stay of execution order was revoked on January 6, 1940, and an alias mandate directed to be issued.
Later, upon motion for rehearing by appellant, the Supreme Court of the United States set aside its former order refusing the writ of certiorari, granted same, and reversed the judgment of this Court, and remanded said cause to this Court for further proceedings not inconsistent with the opinion of said Supreme Court of the United States. 60 S.Ct. 706, 84 L.Ed. ___.
Therefore, in compliance with said opinion this cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceeding in said cause, as may be consistent with the opinion of the Supreme Court of the United States.
Accompanying this order, and as a part thereof, is a certified copy of the mandate from the Supreme Court of the United States, now on file as a part of the record in said cause.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Davis v. State
...... Cf. Luker v. State, 39 Ala.App. 548, 105 So.2d 834 (white defendant convicted of rape on negro girl of 14). . In McGee v. State, 36 Ala.App. 276, 55 So.2d 223, Carr, P. J., gave the facts in part thus: . '* * * he drew a pocket knife and demanded that the prosecutrix remove her clothing. When she refused, he forcibly removed her shoes, ......
-
Ward v. State
....... While the question here presented has been treated and the conclusion reached under the statutes and decisions of this court, the reversal of the case is in keeping with the recent decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in White v. State of Texas, 310 U.S. 530, 60 S.Ct. 1032, 84 L.Ed. 1342; Id., 139 Tex.Cr.R. 660, 128 S.W.2d 51, 141 S.W.2d 951. . For the error discussed, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded. . PER CURIAM. . The foregoing opinion of the ......