White v. Wogaman
Decision Date | 24 February 1936 |
Docket Number | Civil 3656 |
Citation | 47 Ariz. 195,54 P.2d 793 |
Parties | Y. C. WHITE, Superintendent of Banks of the State of Arizona and Receiver of First National Building and Loan Association, Appellant, v. CARMON WOGAMAN and MARION WOGAMAN, Appellees |
Court | Arizona Supreme Court |
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the County of Maricopa. M. T. Phelps, Judge. Judgment reversed and case remanded with instructions.
Mr John L. Sullivan, Attorney General, and Mr. Allan K. Perry Mr. Evo De Concini and Mr. W. Francis Wilson, Assistants Attorney General, for Appellant.
Mr. R G. Langmade, for Appellees.
This is an action by Carmon and Marion Wogaman, hereinafter called plaintiffs, against Y. C. White, hereinafter called defendant, as superintendant of banks of the state of Arizona and thereby ex-officio receiver of First National Building and Loan Association, a corporation, hereinafter called the company, to recover from him the sum of $6,000 together with interest thereon, which it is alleged the company owes to plaintiffs. A judgment was rendered in favor of plaintiffs, whereupon this appeal was taken.
There is little, if any, conflict in the facts necessary for the determination of the case, and we state them as follows. The company was organized under the laws of the state of Arizona in November, 1925. Thereafter, and on May 15, 1926, it filed with the Arizona Corporation Commission amended articles of incorporation which were, in fact and law, a reorganization under the provisions of chapter 76, Session Laws 1925, hereinafter called the act. Before the adoption of this act, there was no special provision of the Arizona law explicitly defining building and loan associations, and regulating their organization and operation, though there were a number of sections of the 1913 Code providing for the manner in which certain phases of their business should be conducted. The act defines building and loan associations as follows:
"Building and Loan Associations are defined hereby to be corporations, societies, organizations or associations having for their object the accumulation by the members of their money by periodical payments into the treasury thereof, to be invested, from time to time in loans to the members upon real estate for home purposes."
It then requires that their articles of incorporation shall contain, among other things, the following provision:
Nowhere in the act is there any express authority given such associations to borrow money from nonmembers for any purpose whatsoever, nor are they authorized to do any acts which would necessarily require such borrowing. The articles of the company therefore stated:
In addition, article 9 thereof reads as follows:
"The highest amount of indebtedness or liability, direct or contingent, to which the corporation is at any time subjected shall never exceed the liability authorized by law."
The by-laws also limited the capital stock of the association to the three kinds above described, and provided somewhat elaborately for the methods of issuing the "Investors Guarantee Dividend Stock." The company was taken over by defendant as an insolvent association on April 7, 1934. Prior to that time, it had collected from various investors some $2,000,000, and some ten or eleven different forms of certificates purporting to be contracts between these investors and the company, defining their respective rights, were issued, aggregating over $1,850,000 book value at the time of the insolvency. Plaintiffs held two so-called "coupon certificates," on which this suit is brought. These certificates, not including the coupons attached thereto, read as follows:
Upon the back was found this indorsement:
"Security: As security for the performance of the obligations of the Association hereunder, the Association will hold intact, subject to the examination and inspection of the State Banking Departments, first mortgages on improved real estate, in an amount equal to at least one hundred per cent of its liability hereunder."
There were outstanding certificates substantially like plaintiffs' aggregating about $200,000 face value, but the great bulk of the certificates issued by the company were substantially in one of the two following forms:
"Maturity Value
Certificate No.
Certificate No.
The blanks as set forth above were filled in in an appropriate manner. Of these certificates an aggregate of some $1,300,000 book value was outstanding. Some of these last two classes of certificates had indorsed on them the security clause found on plaintiffs' certificates, and some did not. There was never, however, any segregation of securities made by the company in accordance with the security clause above for any of the certificates issued by it.
Plaintiffs had paid to the company the sum of $3,000 each for their two certificates above referred to, and had drawn the interest provided by the coupons attached to the certificates several times before the company became insolvent. The receiver admittedly had in his hands, at the beginning of the insolvency, a sum of cash amply...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Radalj v. Union Savings & Loan Ass'n
... ... The certificates issued to plaintiff made ... him a member of the association, irrespective of the language ... of such certificates. White v. Wogoman (Ariz.) 54 ... P.2d 793; Towle v. Ass'n., 75 F. 938; Teller ... v. Wilcoxen (Ia.) 81 N.W. 772; In re Savings ... Ass'n., 253 F ... exclusive provision for the right to borrow ... In the ... case of White vs. Wogaman, 47 Ariz. 195; 54 P.2d ... 793, the court considered the laws relating to building and ... loan associations. The statute provided, similar to ... ...
-
Iowa Credit Union League v. Iowa Dept. of Banking
...F.2d 83, rev'd on other grounds sub nom. Investment Co. Institute v. Camp, 401 U.S. 617, 91 S.Ct. 1091, 28 L.Ed.2d 367; White v. Wogaman, 47 Ariz. 195, 54 P.2d 793; Thrift, Inc. v. State Bank & Trust Co., 298 Ill.App. 501, 19 N.E.2d 126; Smith v. Bath Ln. & Bldg. Ass'n, 126 Me. 59, 136 A. 2......
-
Fidelity Building And Loan Association v. Cox
... ... 523] a different type of that of the ordinary ... corporation, and the rights and limitations of stockholders ... are different. White v. Wogaman, 47 Ariz ... 195, 54 P.2d 793. This is on the theory that purchasers of ... stock therein are generally of a class requiring ... ...
-
Sisk v. White
... ... of the corporation available for distribution for the other ... creditors. This would be, in effect, granting a preference at ... least to the amount of the claim satisfied to one creditor as ... against another. We have held in the case of White ... v. Wogaman, 47 Ariz. 195, 54 [50 Ariz. 107] P.2d ... 793, that this cannot be done, and that all claimants of the ... same class must be cared for equally. We think, therefore, in ... the absence of an affirmative showing that the effect of the ... transaction would be not only to lessen the claim against ... ...