Whitehead v. Bennett

• Court: Colorado Supreme Court
• Writing for the Court: [92 Colo. 550] BUTLER, Justice.
• Citation: Whitehead v. Bennett, 92 Colo. 549, 22 P.2d 168 (Colo. 1933)
• Decision Date: 01 May 1933
• Docket Number: 12777.
• Parties: WHITEHEAD v. BENNETT.

22 P.2d 168

92 Colo. 549

WHITEHEAD v. BENNETT.

No. 12777.

Supreme Court of Colorado

May 1, 1933

In Department.

Error to District Court, Adams County; Samuel W. Johnson, Judge.

Suit by Ray A. Bennett against E. K. Whitchead. To review the judgment, defendant brings error.

Reversed.

Bryan L. Whitechead, of Denver, for plaintiff in error.

Ralph G. Lindstrom, John M. Keating, John W. Shireman, and Harold W. Perry, all of Denver, for defendant in error.

BUTLER, Justice.

Ray A Bennett, who claimed to own certain land, sued E. K Whitehead, the owner of a promissory note secured by a trust deed of the property, to quiet title in Bennett.

Laura P. Strang conveyed to Bennett by quitclaim deed all her right, title, and interest to and in the property. As a matter of law, the grantor had no such right, title, or interest. In his complaint Bennett alleged that for more than seven years he was in possession of the property and paid all taxes legally assessed thereon. He claims that by reason of such possession and payment he should 'be held and adjudged to be the legal owner * * * to the extent and according to the purport of his * * * paper title,' as provided in section 6423, Compiled Laws.

To invoke successfully the provisions of that section, one must prove the payment of taxes for the full period of seven years next prior to the commencement of the suit. The evidence did not show that Bennett paid taxes for the required period of time. His counsel seek to avoid the result of such a situation by saying that the question was not raised in the trial court. They say that the complaint alleged payment for the required time; that the answer did not specifically deny this, but averred, in the language of section 62 of the Code of Civil Procedure, that, as to such allegation, the defendant had not and could not obtain sufficient knowledge or information...