Whitehead v. Bennett
| Decision Date | 01 May 1933 |
| Docket Number | 12777. |
| Citation | 92 Colo. 549,22 P.2d 168 |
| Parties | WHITEHEAD v. BENNETT. |
| Court | Colorado Supreme Court |
In Department.
Error to District Court, Adams County; Samuel W. Johnson, Judge.
Suit by Ray A. Bennett against E. K. Whitchead. To review the judgment, defendant brings error.
Reversed.
Bryan L. Whitechead, of Denver, for plaintiff in error.
Ralph G. Lindstrom, John M. Keating, John W. Shireman, and Harold W. Perry, all of Denver, for defendant in error.
Ray A Bennett, who claimed to own certain land, sued E. K Whitehead, the owner of a promissory note secured by a trust deed of the property, to quiet title in Bennett.
Laura P. Strang conveyed to Bennett by quitclaim deed all her right, title, and interest to and in the property. As a matter of law, the grantor had no such right, title, or interest. In his complaint Bennett alleged that for more than seven years he was in possession of the property and paid all taxes legally assessed thereon. He claims that by reason of such possession and payment he should 'be held and adjudged to be the legal owner * * * to the extent and according to the purport of his * * * paper title,' as provided in section 6423, Compiled Laws.
To invoke successfully the provisions of that section, one must prove the payment of taxes for the full period of seven years next prior to the commencement of the suit. The evidence did not show that Bennett paid taxes for the required period of time. His counsel seek to avoid the result of such a situation by saying that the question was not raised in the trial court. They say that the complaint alleged payment for the required time; that the answer did not specifically deny this, but averred, in the language of section 62 of the Code of Civil Procedure, that, as to such allegation, the defendant had not and could not obtain sufficient knowledge or information upon which to base a belief; and that as the payment of taxes is a matter of record and therefore presumptively within the knowledge of Whitehead, such denial did not raise an issue. We cannot uphold this contention. It assumes, contrary to the fact, that the record shows payment by Bennett for the required period of time. The case tried on the theory that the issue had been raised. Assuming the burden of proving such payments, Bennett introduced all his tax receipts, and they showed that the first payment was made less than seven years before the...
To continue reading
Request your trial
- Columbia Trust Co. v. Farmers' & Merchants' Bank
-
Peters v. Smuggler-Durant Min. Corp.
...under color of title first pays taxes and the commencement of his or her lawsuit." Peters, 910 P.2d at 39 (citing Whitehead v. Bennett, 92 Colo. 549, 22 P.2d 168 (1933); Cristler v. Beardsley, 25 Colo.App. 369, 138 P. 68 (1914); and Empire Ranch & Cattle Co. v. Howell, 22 Colo.App. 584, 126......
-
Graniteville Co. v. Williams
... ... 340, 150 N.W. 420; Jones ... et al. v. Coal Creek Mining & Manufacturing Co. et al., ... 133 Tenn. 159, 180 S.W. 179; Whitehead v. Bennett, ... 92 Colo. 549, 22 P.2d 168; Warlick v. Rome Loan & Finance ... Co., 194 Ga. 419, 22 S.E.2d 61; annotations 4 L.R.A.,N.S., ... page ... ...
-
Peters v. Smuggler-Durant Min. Corp., SMUGGLER-DURANT
...person claiming the property under color of title first pays taxes and the commencement of his or her lawsuit. See Whitehead v. Bennett, 92 Colo. 549, 22 P.2d 168 (1933); Cristler v. Beardsley, 25 Colo.App. 369, 138 P. 68 (1914); Empire Ranch & Cattle Co. v. Howell, 22 Colo.App. 584, 126 P.......
-
Chapter 21 - § 21.3 • ESSENTIAL ELEMENTS
...1897); Frey v. Paul, 193 P. 560 (Colo. 1920) (irrigation ditch).[132] Marks v. Morris, 129 P. 828 (Colo. 1913); Whitehead v. Bennett, 22 P.2d 168 (Colo. 1933); Empire Ranch & Cattle Co. v. Howell, 126 P. 1096 (Colo. App. 1912); Peters v. Smuggler-Durant Mining Corp., 910 P.2d 34 (Colo. App.......
-
Chapter 21 - § 21.4 • CLAIMS UNDER COLOR OF TITLE
...P. 242 (Colo. 1894); Parker v. Betts, 107 P. 816 (Colo. 1910).[162] Munro v. Eshe, 156 P.2d 700 (Colo. 1944). [163] Whitehead v. Bennett, 22 P.2d 168 (Colo. 1933).[164] Martin v. Witherbee, 168 P. 651 (Colo. 1917); Munro v. Eshe, 156 P.2d 700 (Colo. 1944).[165] First Nat'l Bank of Wray v. M......