Whitman v. Warden, Nevada State Prisons, 7572
| Decision Date | 23 December 1974 |
| Docket Number | No. 7572,7572 |
| Parties | Edward WHITMAN, aka James Jones, Appellant, v. WARDEN, NEVADA STATE PRISON, Respondent. |
| Court | Nevada Supreme Court |
Edward Whitman, appellant, pleaded guilty to the charges of attempted burglary and battery with intent to commit rape. On denial of his petition for post-conviction relief, Whitman seeks reversal contending that the district court erred in denying his petition without holding an evidentiary hearing to determine whether his guilty plea was involuntarily entered and contending that his plea had been involuntarily entered becuase he was threatened with an habitual criminal charge.
This court held in Fine v. Warden, 90 Nev. 166, 521 P.2d 374 (1974), that there is a right to an evidentiary hearing when seeking postconviction relief as to the issue of whether or not an alleged promise was made by the State and not fulfilled upon which the guilty plea was based. That case is clearly distinguishable from the case before the court in that Whitman's claim concerns a question of law as to whether a guilty plea based on a threat of being charged with an habitual criminal charge is coerced as compared to the factual issue of whether a promise was made or not. There is no right to an evidentiary hearing when the issue before the court is a legal issue and not a factual issue. Forrester v. United States, 456 F.2d 905 (5th Cir. 1972), cert. den., 409 U.S. 856, 93 S.Ct. 136, 34 L.Ed.2d 101 (1972); Barnett v. United States, 439 F.2d 801 (6th Cir. 1971). 1
A guilty plea is not coerced merely because motivated by a desire to avoid the possibility of a higher penalty (Brady v. United States, 397 U.S. 742, 90 S.Ct. 1463, 25 L.Ed.2d 747 (1970); Conger v. Warden, 89 Nev. 263, 510 P.2d 1359 (1973)) and this court has held that a plea motivated by the desire to avoid being charged under the habitual criminal act was not coerced. Schoultz v. Warden, 88 Nev. 135, 494 P.2d 274 (1972), rev'd on other grounds, Schoultz v. Hocker, 469 F.2d 681 (9th Cir. 1972); Stocks v. Warden, 86 Nev. 758, 476 P.2d 469 (1970). As to Whitman's statement at the time he entered the plea that he was not in fact guilty but was pleading guilty to a lesser charge to avoid the possibility of a...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Gonzales v. State
...[it is] motivated by a desire to avoid the possibility of a higher penalty" or habitual criminal treatment, Whitman v. Warden , 90 Nev. 434, 436, 529 P.2d 792, 793 (1974). And Gonzales's other allegations do not support that he was coerced, see Coerce, Black's Law Dictionary (11th ed. 2019)......
-
Schmidt v. State
...charge in order to avoid the threat of the habitual criminal statute will not give rise to a claim of coercion. Whitman v. Warden, 90 Nev. 434, 529 P.2d 792 (1974); Stocks v. Warden, 86 Nev. 758, 476 P.2d 469 It also is alleged by appellant that the prosecution was fully aware of his prior ......
-
Elliston v. State
...plea is not coerced merely because it is motivated by a desire to avoid the possibility of a higher penalty. See Whitman v. Warden, 90 Nev. 434, 436, 529 P.2d 792, 793 (1974). Therefore, we conclude Elliston is not entitled to relief on this claim, and weORDER the judgment of conviction ...
-
Hargrove v. State
...statute will not give rise to a claim of coercion." Schmidt v. State, 94 Nev. 665, 667, 584 P.2d 695, 696 (1978); see Whitman v. Warden, 90 Nev. 434, 529 P.2d 792 (1974). Appellant's contention that his plea should have been withdrawn because he is actually innocent of the charge is also wi......