Whittemore v. Terral
Decision Date | 17 November 1919 |
Docket Number | 202 |
Citation | 215 S.W. 686,140 Ark. 493 |
Parties | WHITTEMORE v. TERRAL |
Court | Arkansas Supreme Court |
Appeal from Pulaski Circuit Court, Third Division; G. W. Hendricks Judge; affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Cohn Clayton & Cohn, for appellants.
1. The Federal Constitution does not restrict the power of the States so as to prohibit them from controlling the action of their representative legislative assemblies by referendum to the people or otherwise, but relates to the ultimate legislative authority of the States expressed and the action of the Legislature ratifying the amendment falls within the terms of Amendment No. 10 providing for the referendum. Art 5, U. S. Const. "Legislature" does not mean legislative assemblies, but allows the people to concur or ratify by referendum vote. 94 Ohio St. 154; 114 N.E. 55; Webster's
New Int. Nat. Dict., "Legislature," Cent. Dict. verbum; 1 Bryce Am. Commonwealth, p. 461; 241 U.S. 567, 565-8; 127 N.W. 848; 44 Ore. 118; 53 Id. 163; 241 U.S. 565-569; 223 U.S. 118; Cooley, Const. Lim., p. 59, note 3; Dwarris 704; 9 Wheat, 1-7; 223 U.S. 118; Const. 1874, art. 2, §§ 1-29; 104 Ark. 563-5.
The people are at least part of the Legislature within article 5 of the United States Constitution and a reference to the people of an act, H. R. No. 1, does not contravene that Constitution.
2. The act was subject to a referendum vote, comes within the 10th Amendment. 119 Ark. 314; 171 S.W. 871; 173 Id. 1099; 76 Ark. 303; 60 Id. 343; 26 Id. 281-285; 119 Ark. 322; 76 Id. 303; 9 Id. 270; 51 Id. 534; 11 S.W. 878. The provisions of Amendment No. 10 must be liberally construed to effect the purpose of the people. 103 Ark. 48-57; 162 U.S. 197; 3 How. 24; 1 Wheat. (U.S.) 120; 91 U.S. 72; Endlich, Int. Stat., § 29; 57 F. 426; 62 62 A. 1035; 71 Kan. 811; 81 P. 450; 70 L. R. A. 450; 6 Am. Cases 298; 23 Mich. 499; 130 Mo.App. 687; 108 S.W. 1095.
By the terms of the 10th Amendment the power is reserved in the people to approve or reject any act of the legislative assembly. The word "act" means any "action" taken. 1 A. & Eng. Enc. Law. (2 Ed.) 575; 1 Bouvier 102; Funk & Wagnell New Stand. Dict., p. 29; Webster New Int. Dict., p. 22, subd. 2; Smith v. Strothers, 8 P. 852; 68 Cal. 194.
The effect and substance of an act and not the name are to be considered. 181 P. 920; 66 Ore. 70-78; 130 S.W. 689; 86 Ore. 390; 45 S.E. 821; 206 U.S. 276; 232 U.S. 548-556. See also 106 Ark. 506-509-10; 104 Id. 583-591; 105 Id. 380; 103 Ark. 48-52-57; 104 Ark. 583; 53 Mich. 681; 176 U.S. 581-602; 123 Id. 623-661; 117 Ark. 582.
The initiative and referendum amendment is self-executing and needs no act of the Legislature to effect its purpose. 103 Ark. 48-52; 104 Id. 583, etc.
John D. Arbuckle, Attorney General, and Robert C. Knox, Assistant, for appellee.
The term "Legislature" as used in article 5 means the General Assembly of the State. 3 How. (U.S.) 24; 23 Mich. 499; 121 U.S. 12. The power of ratification conferred by the Federal Constitution relates solely to the legislative assemblies of the States and can not be brought within the reserved legislative authority of the people themselves, and the language of Amendment No. 10 does not apply the referendum to the action of the General Assembly in ratifying the amendment to the Federal Constitution. 2 How. 24; 121 U.S. 12; 146 Id. 1; 45 N.H. 601; 4 Elliott's Debates, 407; 119 Ark. 314; 26 S.D. 5; 223 U.S. 117; 3 Howard 24; 23 Mich. 499; 121 U.S. 12. The words "act of the Legislature," as used in Amendment No. 10 to our Constitution, does not contemplate resolutions but means acts passed by the Legislature, and the word "act" means "law" duly passed, and does not include a joint resolution. Cases supra.
The General Assembly of this State, during the last session thereof, adopted a joint resolution ratifying the proposed amendment to the Constitution of the United States prohibiting "the manufacture, sale or transportation of intoxicating liquors within, the importation thereof into, or the exportation thereof from the United States and all the territory subject to the jurisdiction thereof, for beverage purposes," and appellants and other legal voters constituting more than five (5) per centum of the voters of the State filed their petition with the Secretary of State in apt time asking for a referendum to the people of said resolution in accordance with the provisions of Amendment No. 10 to the Constitution. The Secretary of State refused to certify the referendum, and this action was instituted by appellants in the circuit court of Pulaski County to compel him to do so.
The contention of appellants is (1) that the Federal Constitution, in providing for the ratification of amendments by "the Legislatures of three-fourths of the several States," does not restrict the powers of the States so as to prohibit them from controlling the action of their representative legislative assemblies by referendum to the people or otherwise, but that it relates to the ultimate legislative authority of the States, in whatever form expressed; and (2) that the action of the General Assembly of this State ratifying the amendment falls within the terms of Amendment No. 10, providing for the referendum.
On the other hand, it is contended by the Attorney General, who appears on behalf of the Secretary of State, that the power of ratification conferred by the Federal Constitution relates solely to the legislative assemblies of the States, that it can not be brought within the reserved legislative authority of the people themselves, and that the language of Amendment No. 10 does not apply the referendum to the action of the General Assembly in ratifying an amendment to the Federal Constitution.
We proceed to a consideration of the last of the propositions stated, and since our conclusion on that is found to be decisive of this case, we need go no further.
Amendment No. 10 does not, in our opinion, provide for a referendum on the action of the General Assembly in ratifying an amendment to the Federal Constitution. That portion of our Constitution reads as follows:
An analysis of this provision of our Constitution reveals the fact that the reserved referendum power of the people relates only to laws enacted by the General Assembly. The word "act," as there used, means an enacted law--a statute. This is clearly manifested by that part of the language used which provides that referendum petitions must be filed not more than ninety days after adjournment of the session "at which the bill on which the referendum is demanded," and that a "measure referred to the people shall take effect and become a law when it is approved by a majority vote thereon." The words "act" and "measure" and "law" are used interchangeably, showing plainly that the power relates to the enactment of laws, and...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
American Federation of Labor v. Eu
...565, 177 N.W. 388), while Arkansas, Colorado, and Oregon reached the same result on state constitutional grounds (Whittemore v. Terral (1919) 140 Ark. 493, 215 S.W. 686; Prior v. Noland (1920) 68 Colo. 263, 188 P. 729; Herbring v. Brown (1919) 92 Or. 176, 180 P. 328.) Ohio and Washington, h......
-
Brickhouse v. Hill
... ... enacted," etc., was not necessary on bills passed by the ... General Assembly ... ... Whittemore v. Terral, 140 Ark. 493, 215 ... S.W. 686, held that a referendum did not lie to the action of ... the General Assembly in adopting an amendment ... ...
-
Brickhouse v. Hill
...decided that the style of bills "be it enacted," etc., was not necessary on bills passed by the General Assembly. Whittemore v. Terral, 140 Ark. 493, 215 S. W. 686, held that a referendum did not lie to the action of the General Assembly in adopting an amendment to the federal Mitchell v. H......
-
State ex rel. Smiley v. Holm
...10 A.L.R. 1504; Barlotti v. Lyons, 182 Cal. 575, 189 P. 282; Decher v. Secretary of State, 209 Mich. 565, 177 N.W. 388; Whittemore v. Terral, 140 Ark. 493, 215 S.W. 686; Prior v. Noland, 68 Colo. 263, 188 P. The legislature in districting the state is not, strictly in the discharge of legis......