Wicker v. Wicker, No. 528

Docket NºNo. 528
Citation255 N.C. 723, 122 S.E.2d 703
Case DateNovember 22, 1961
CourtUnited States State Supreme Court of North Carolina

Page 703

122 S.E.2d 703
255 N.C. 723
David Lloyd WICKER
v.
Nellie Grace Yow WICKER.
No. 528
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Nov. 22, 1961

Gavin, Jackson & Williams, Sanford, for defendant-appellant.

Hoyle & Hoyle, Pittman, Staton & Betts, Sanford, for plaintiff-appellee.

[255 N.C. 724] PER CURIAM.

The previous action, a habeas corpus proceeding to determine the custody of the children of the marriage involved in the instant case, was heard by the trial judge who, sitting without a jury, found as a fact, among other things, that Nellie Grace Yow Wicker had not committed adultery with any person, and entered judgment in accordance therewith.

G.S. § 50-10 requires that, in a divorce action, the material facts as to the

Page 704

grounds for divorce must be found by a jury. Carpenter v. Carpenter, 244 N.C. 286, 93 S.E.2d 617.

Thus, it is patent that the order entered in the habeas corpus proceeding based on facts found by the trial judge is not res judicata to this action for divorce upon the ground of adultery.

Hence, the order from which appeal is taken is

Affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 practice notes
  • Eudy v. Eudy, No. 124
    • United States
    • North Carolina United States State Supreme Court of North Carolina
    • June 26, 1975
    ...in the complaint and found by the finder of fact to be true before a divorce judgment may be entered. G.S. § 50--10; Wicker v. Wicker, 255 N.C. 723, 122 S.E.2d 703; Israel v. Israel, 255 N.C. 391, 121 S.E.2d 713; Martin v. Martin, 253 N.C. 704, 118 S.E.2d 29; Pruett v. Pruett, Supra; Carpen......
  • Fulton v. Vickery, No. 8415SC575
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeal of North Carolina (US)
    • March 5, 1985
    ...in an action for divorce or annulment, the material facts in every complaint must be found by a judge or a jury. See Wicker v. Wicker, 255 N.C. 723, 122 S.E.2d 703 (1961). The trial court in the original action did not make such findings of fact. See also N.C.Gen.Stat. Sec. 50-4 (1984) ("Wh......
  • Morris v. Morris, No. 7926DC529
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeal of North Carolina (US)
    • February 5, 1980
    ...action. Prior to 1963, a verdict by a jury was required to support a judgment for absolute divorce in this State. Wicker v. Wicker, 255 N.C. 723, 122 S.E.2d 703 (1961). In 1963, the General Assembly amended the statutes to allow the trial judge to find the facts in actions for divorce based......
  • Newman v. Home Life Ins. Co., No. 523
    • United States
    • North Carolina United States State Supreme Court of North Carolina
    • November 22, 1961
    ...Her right against the insurance company terminated at the end of the grace period by reason of the failure on the part of her [255 N.C. 723] employer to keep the contract alive by paying the required premium. Although the plaintiff paid her employer, who defaulted, her recourse is not again......
4 cases
  • Eudy v. Eudy, No. 124
    • United States
    • North Carolina United States State Supreme Court of North Carolina
    • June 26, 1975
    ...in the complaint and found by the finder of fact to be true before a divorce judgment may be entered. G.S. § 50--10; Wicker v. Wicker, 255 N.C. 723, 122 S.E.2d 703; Israel v. Israel, 255 N.C. 391, 121 S.E.2d 713; Martin v. Martin, 253 N.C. 704, 118 S.E.2d 29; Pruett v. Pruett, Supra; Carpen......
  • Fulton v. Vickery, No. 8415SC575
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeal of North Carolina (US)
    • March 5, 1985
    ...in an action for divorce or annulment, the material facts in every complaint must be found by a judge or a jury. See Wicker v. Wicker, 255 N.C. 723, 122 S.E.2d 703 (1961). The trial court in the original action did not make such findings of fact. See also N.C.Gen.Stat. Sec. 50-4 (1984) ("Wh......
  • Morris v. Morris, No. 7926DC529
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeal of North Carolina (US)
    • February 5, 1980
    ...action. Prior to 1963, a verdict by a jury was required to support a judgment for absolute divorce in this State. Wicker v. Wicker, 255 N.C. 723, 122 S.E.2d 703 (1961). In 1963, the General Assembly amended the statutes to allow the trial judge to find the facts in actions for divorce based......
  • Newman v. Home Life Ins. Co., No. 523
    • United States
    • North Carolina United States State Supreme Court of North Carolina
    • November 22, 1961
    ...Her right against the insurance company terminated at the end of the grace period by reason of the failure on the part of her [255 N.C. 723] employer to keep the contract alive by paying the required premium. Although the plaintiff paid her employer, who defaulted, her recourse is not again......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT