Wilkerson v. Chattahoochee Parks, Inc.

Decision Date16 October 1979
Docket NumberNo. 35255,35255
Citation260 S.E.2d 867,244 Ga. 472
PartiesWILKERSON et al. v. CHATTAHOOCHEE PARKS, INC.
CourtGeorgia Supreme Court

Joseph E. Wilkerson, Atlanta, for appellants.

Sartain & Carey, W. Allen Myers, Jack M. Carey, Gainesville, for appellee.

MARSHALL, Justice.

The appellants leased two houseboat spaces from the appellee for a term of one year. During the term of the lease, the appellee informed the appellants that the lease was being terminated under the provisions of Paragraph 11, which provide that "discord or indecorous conduct by lessee, his family or his visitors, which may, In the sole discretion of lessor, result in injury to a person, cause damage to property, Or harm the reputation of the marina shall be cause for Immediate cancellation of this lease by lessor." (Emphasis supplied.) The appellants filed suit for a temporary restraining order, which was granted. A rule nisi hearing was scheduled for June 11, 1979. On May 25, the appellee filed its answer, and also a counterclaim to dissolve the t. r. o. and to order the appellants to remove their houseboats from the appellee's premises. Following the hearing, the trial court entered an order on June 12 granting the prayers for relief in the appellee's counterclaim, from which order this appeal is taken.

1. The appellee has moved to dismiss the appeal as moot, on the ground that no supersedeas or injunction pending appeal was obtained and the appellants have voluntarily performed the act they sought to enjoin, i. e., the removal of their houseboats from the appellee's marina. See, e. g., Crim v. Sorrow, 243 Ga. 477, 255 S.E.2d 19 (1979); Faulkner v. Ga. Power Co., 241 Ga. 618, 247 S.E.2d 80 (1978) and cits.; Douglas County v. Hasty, 237 Ga. 646, 229 S.E.2d 435 (1976) and cit. Such cases are not applicable here, however, where the appellants filed an extraordinary motion for supersedeas with this court, which was denied, and where the appellants filed an answer alleging that their removal of the houseboats was not done voluntarily, but to prevent a further breach of the peace and to prevent further damages to the houseboats. The motion to dismiss is denied.

2. The trial court did not err in advancing and consolidating the trial of the action on the merits with the hearing on the appellants' application for an interlocutory injunction without prior notice to the parties. Code Ann. § 81A-165(a)(2) (Ga.L.1966, pp. 609, 665; 1967, pp. 226, 240; 1972, pp. 689, 698) permits this action "after the commencement of the hearing." While § 81A-165(a)(1) provides, "No interlocutory injunction shall be issued without notice to the adverse party," the appellants were on notice of the hearing. In addition, the appellants did not object at trial to the trial judge's hearing the merits of the case at the interlocutory injunction hearing.

3. The appellants contend that it was error to order their houseboats removed from the appellee's premises, because the only procedure by which a landlord can evict a tenant is under Code Ch. 61-3, "Proceedings against tenants holding over."

"Code Ann. § 61-102(b) (Ga.L.1976, pp. 1372, 1373) provides that a landlord may not avoid in any lease 'for the use or rental of real property As a dwelling-place ' any of the requirements set forth in Chapters 61-3 or 61-4. (Emphasis supplied.) Conversely, it follows that a landlord May contract to avoid these statutory requirements when renting property which is not to be used as a dwelling-place.'' Colonial Self Storage etc., Inc. v. Concord Properties, Inc., 147 Ga.App. 493, 495, 249 S.E.2d 310, 311 (1978). No contention is made in the present case that the slips or spaces in the marina, or even the houseboats docked there, were to be, or were in fact, used as dwelling places.

"Parties laboring under no disabilities may make contracts on their own terms, and in the absence of fraud or mistake or terms that are illegal or contrary to public policy, they must abide the contract. The fact that it is unwise or disadvantageous to one party furnishes no reason for disregarding it." Yon v. City of Atlanta, 201 Ga....

To continue reading

Request your trial
10 cases
  • Focus Entertainment v. Partridge Greene
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • 19 December 2001
    ...the parties, the parties waive any objection to such consolidation into a final hearing on the merits. Wilkerson v. Chattahoochee Parks, 244 Ga. 472, 473(2), 260 S.E.2d 867 (1979). However, a consolidation of the interlocutory hearing into a final hearing cannot be done by the trial court w......
  • Richmond County Hosp. Authority v. Richmond County, s. 42571
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • 21 November 1985
    ...the issues delineated by the trial judge without objecting to the judge's hearing the merits of the case. Wilkerson v. Chattahoochee Parks, Inc., 244 Ga. 472(2), 260 S.E.2d 867 (1979). 5. In view of our reversal of the judgment in this case, it is unnecessary to rule upon the appeal in Case......
  • McHugh Fuller Law Grp., PLLC v. Pruitthealth-Toccoa, LLC
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • 11 May 2015
    ...hearing where trial court informed parties 772 S.E.2d 664during the hearing that it might do so); Wilkerson v. Chattahoochee Parks, Inc., 244 Ga. 472(2), 260 S.E.2d 867 (1979) (no error in rendering final ruling on the merits following interlocutory hearing where appellants did not object t......
  • Nelson v. Polk County Historical Soc., Inc.
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • 17 March 1995
    ...rental of real property for purposes other than a (mundane) dwelling place. See OCGA § 44-7-2(b). See, e.g., Wilkerson v. Chattahoochee Parks, 244 Ga. 472, 473(3), 260 S.E.2d 867; Colonial Self Storage of the South East v. Concord Properties, 147 Ga.App. 493, 494(1), 495, 249 S.E.2d 310. Ac......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT