Williams v. Edwards

Decision Date19 March 1888
Citation94 Mo. 447,7 S.W. 429
PartiesWILLIAMS v. EDWARDS.
CourtMissouri Supreme Court

Appeal from circuit court, Macon county; ANDREW ELLISON, Judge.

This is an action of ejectment brought by John F. Williams, superintendent of the insurance department of Missouri, against Charles S. Edwards. Defendant obtained judgment, and plaintiff appeals.

W. S. Relfe and John T. Jones, for appellant. Eli J. Newton and Dysart & Mitchell, for respondent.

SHERWOOD, J.

Ejectment for land in Macon county. Answer of defendant, a general denial, and to the effect that the note secured by the deed of trust given by him, and under which the land was sold, had been satisfied prior to the sale; and there was a prayer asking that the deed of trust be declared satisfied; the deed of the trustee made by virtue thereof to the St. Louis Life Insurance Company, and the deed to the Life Association of America, be set aside, etc.; and for other and further relief. Reply puts in issue the allegations of the answer as to payment, etc. The cause came on for hearing, and "plaintiff's title papers were regular in every respect, consisting of (1) deed of trust from C. S. Edwards to Thos. A. Russell, trustee of Mount City Mutual Life Insurance Company, dated June 30, 1870, and recorded July 2, 1870, in book 12, at page 14. (2) Thos. A. Russell, trustee, to St. Louis Life Insurance Company, trustee's deed sale, made as authorized in said deed of trust, dated June 20, 1874; recorded June 23, 1874, in book 19, page 383. (3) Charter of Columbia Life Insurance Company, successor to St. Louis Life Insurance Company, dated January 29, 1876. (4) Columbia Life Insurance Company to Life Association of America, warranty deed, dated February 6, 1877; recorded February 19, 1877, in book 27, page 54; consideration, $1,200. (5) Decree of the circuit court of St. Louis adjudging said Life Association of America insolvent, and appointing the superintendent of insurance department receiver thereof. It was admitted that John F. Williams is such superintendent." And there were admissions made by the parties litigant that showed the paper title to the premises was in the plaintiff. On his part, the defendant, in his testimony, "admitted the execution of the deed of trust above described, but claimed that, prior to the sale thereunder, he had made a settlement with T. G. Sharp, who was then agent of the Mound City Life Insurance Company, authorized to solicit insurance for said company. That the arrangement with said Sharp was that defendant was to surrender a life policy he held in said company, in full payment and satisfaction of said deed of trust. That Sharp afterwards told him it was all right, and he might rest easy. Thought his talk with Sharp about a settlement was in 1873. That Sharp had been dead more than a year. That he never received...

To continue reading

Request your trial
80 cases
  • Carroll v. United Rys. Co. of St. Louis
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • 2 Mayo 1911
    ...to mean the person who negotiated the contract rather than the person in whose name and interest it was made;" and Williams v. Edwards, 94 Mo. 447, 7 S. W. 429, as expressly holding that both parties to the action being alive, one of them will not be competent to testify if the agent who ne......
  • Wagner v. Binder
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 1 Julio 1916
    ...not. The doctrine of this case was substantially reaffirmed in the case of Leeper v. McGuire, 57 Mo. 360. The subsequent case of Williams v. Edwards, 94 Mo. 447 , only decided that, where a contract is made by a corporation and its contracting agent dies, this renders the other contracting ......
  • Freeman v. Berberich
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 20 Abril 1933
    ...`other party' and stand in the place of the corporation with respect to the cause of action in issue and on trial. [See Williams v. Edwards, 94 Mo. 447, 7 S.W. 429.] In this view, it seems that Teague, defendant's watchman, should be regarded as the `other party' to the cause of action here......
  • J.E. Blank, Inc., v. Lennox Land Co.
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 20 Julio 1943
    ...House v. Rood, 132 Mo. 256, 33 S.W. 816; In re Farmers & Merchants Bank of Lynn-Leismeyer v. Moberly, 119 S.W. (2d) 1012; Williams v. Edwards, 94 Mo. 447, 7 S.W. 429; Lead & Zinc Co. v. Lead Co., 251 Mo. 721, 158 S.W. 369; Norvell v. Cooper, 155 Mo. App. 445, 134 S.W. 1095; People's Bank of......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT