Williams v. Miller, 82-1334
| Decision Date | 16 June 1983 |
| Docket Number | No. 82-1334,82-1334 |
| Citation | 433 So.2d 33 |
| Parties | Jay Wilson WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. Claude W. MILLER, Sheriff of Brevard County, Florida, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Dan R. Warren and Craig Stephen Boda of Judge & Warren, P.A., Daytona Beach, for appellant.
Catherine A. Riley of Blumenthal, Schwartz & Riley, P.A., Titusville, for appellee.
We affirm the forfeiture of appellant's pickup truck under section 932.703(1), Florida Statutes (1981), because there was evidence from which the trial judge, as trier of the facts, logically deducted the conclusion that appellant unlawfully transported, carried or conveyed (§ 932.702, Fla.Stat. (1981)) in his pickup truck, a controlled substance as defined in chapter 893, Florida Statutes, which is a "contraband article" as defined in section 932.701(2)(a), Florida Statutes (1981). Law enforcement officers testified a searched informant had no dilaudids on him when he entered appellant's pickup truck but did when he exited. See In re Forfeiture of 1979 Toyota Corolla Automobile Vin # KE 30619534, 424 So.2d 922 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982).
In addition to the $3,000 of marked funds given the informant in order to make the "controlled buy" of drugs, when arrested appellant also possessed $1,007.83. However, there was no competent evidence before the trial judge from which to draw a legal conclusion that the $1,007.83 had been, or was actually employed as, an instrumentality in the commission of, or in aiding or abetting in the commission of, any felony, and, therefore, contraband under section 932.701(2)(e), Florida Statutes (1981), and, accordingly, the order forfeiting that money is reversed.
AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; AND REMANDED FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles v. Pollack, 84-781
...re Forfeiture of a 1977 Datsun 280Z Automobile, 448 So.2d 78 (Fla. 4th DCA), review denied, 453 So.2d 43 (Fla.1984); Williams v. Miller, 433 So.2d 33 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983); City of Clearwater v. Malick, 429 So.2d 718 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); Naples Police Department v. Small, 426 So.2d 72 (Fla. 2d......
-
Fletcher v. Metro Dade Police Dept. Law Enforcement Trust Fund
...in the commission of a felony. Therefore, the money is not contraband, and the order of forfeiture must be reversed. Williams v. Miller, 433 So.2d 33 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983). Regardless of the existence of probable cause, lack of knowledge by Fletcher that the property was being employed in cri......
-
City of St. Petersburg Beach v. Jewell
...or with any other crime and did not meet the criteria for forfeiture under either of the statutory provisos. See Williams v. Miller, 433 So.2d 33 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983). The order of the trial court is DANAHY, A.C.J., and SANDERLIN, J., concur. ...
-
Vessel Described as one 36 Foot Mirage, BHN CBD 36011M831 Displaying Florida Registration Numbers FL5182 EM v. State, Dept. of Natural Resources, 85-1966
...appellant's contentions, Adoue v. State, 408 So.2d 567 (Fla.1981); Hendrix v. State, 456 So.2d 494 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984); Williams v. Miller, 433 So.2d 33 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983); In Re Forfeiture of 1979 Lincoln Continental, 405 So.2d 249 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Gomez v. State, 402 So.2d 1239 (Fla. 3......