Williams v. Rollins

Decision Date01 June 1917
Docket NumberNo. 18508.,18508.
Citation195 S.W. 1009,271 Mo. 150
PartiesWILLIAMS v. ROLLINS et al.
CourtMissouri Supreme Court

Appeal from Circuit Court, St. Louis County; John W. McElhinney, Judge.

Bill by Charles Williams, executor, etc., against John G. Weber and others. From the decree, certain minor defendants, by I. A. Rollins, their guardian ad litem, appeal. Judgment against appellants reversed, and cause remanded, with directions.

J. C. Kiskaddon, of Clayton, W. H. Hills, of Enid, Okl., and Joseph G. Williams of St. Louis, for appellants. Buell L. Matthews, of St. Louis, for respondents Lindsay and Weber, administrator.

BOND, J.

I. On February 28, 1887, Thomas F. Ackerman and Susan Ackerman, his wife, legally adopted a child whom they named Mary. She afterwards married one Ira C. Cline, and of this marriage seven children were born, two of whom died in infancy; the other five, who survived their mother, are designated herein as the Cline heirs.

After the death of his adopted daughter Mary, Thomas Ackerman executed his last will and testament, by which he bequeathed to each of the Cline heirs one dollar; to his wife Susan all of his personal property, absolutely, with a life estate in all real estate of which he might die possessed, with remainder over to the children of his sister Elizabeth Perkins. His wife was named as executrix, and Charles Williams named in her stead in case of her death or inability to act. She having died before her husband, his will as originally drawn was duly probated on November 28, 1908; Charles Williams qualifying as executor.

During the course of the administration of the estate, John G. Weber, administrator of the estate of Elizabeth Perkins, deceased, represented the interests of the heirs of said Elizabeth Perkins, Benjamin C. Lindsay claimed by right of purchase the interests of the heirs of James Ackerman, deceased, brother of the testator, and the Cline heirs presented their claims as heirs and legatees. One Alice Otter also presented a claim for services, which was allowed and paid, and a further claim by right of gift of a certain note for $1,600, together with two interest notes for $45 each, secured by a deed of trust.

When the executor presented his accounts for final settlement, the court found the amount in which the executor was indebted to the estate, but, having been of counsel, refused to order distribution on account of the above adverse claims to said fund. Thereupon the executor filed this bill in equity in the circuit court and prayed that the several claimants be compelled to interplead. The decree so ordered and commanded Executor Williams to pay the fund of $11,239.47 into court.

Thereafter interpleas were duly filed, and ...

To continue reading

Request your trial
15 cases
  • Leeper v. Leeper
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Missouri
    • February 14, 1941
    ...S.W.2d 673; Fosburgh v. Rogers, 114 Mo. 122; Bernero v. Goodwin, 267 Mo. 427, 184 S.W. 74; Moran v. Stewart, 122 Mo. 295; Williams v. Rollins, 195 S.W. 1009, 271 Mo. 50; Rauch v. Metz, 212 S.W. 357. (3) Under the statute passed in 1917, by which respondent's rights are determined, he became......
  • Leeper v. Leeper, 37082.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Missouri
    • February 14, 1941
    ......Dorman, 98 S.W. (2d) 673; Fosburgh v. Rogers, 114 Mo. 122; Bernero v. Goodwin, 267 Mo. 427, 184 S.W. 74; Moran v. Stewart, 122 Mo. 295; Williams v. Rollins, 195 S.W. 1009, 271 Mo. 50; Rauch v. Metz, 212 S.W. 357. (3) Under the adoption statute passed in 1917, by which respondent's rights are ......
  • In re Estate of Cupples
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Missouri
    • December 3, 1917
    ...of the faculty of inheritance by her death. That this is true has become the settled doctrine of this court. [Williams v. Rollins, 271 Mo. 150, 195 S.W. 1009; Bernero v. Goodwin, 267 Mo. 427, 184 S.W. 74.] The next section imposes upon the adopting parent the duty and upon the child the rig......
  • Hoellinger v. Molzhon, 7149.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of North Dakota
    • February 3, 1950
    ......87, 202 P. 601;Markover v. Krause 132 Ind. 294, 31 N.E. 1047, 1050,17 L.R.A. 806;In re Cook's Estate, 114 App.Div. 718,99 N.E. 1049;Williams v. Rollins, 271 Mo. 150, 195 S.W. 1009;Bernero v. Goodwin, 267 Mo. 427, 434, 184 S.W. 74.         While there are authorities to the ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT