Williams v. State

Decision Date23 June 1937
Docket NumberNo. 19063.,19063.
Citation107 S.W.2d 996
PartiesWILLIAMS v. STATE.
CourtTexas Court of Criminal Appeals

Appeal from Wise County Court; F. A. Davenport, Judge.

I. R. Williams was convicted of selling inferior motor fuel from pumps which did not state that fuel was inferior, and he appeals.

Judgment of conviction reversed, and prosecution ordered dismissed.

John L. Poulter, of Fort Worth, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State's Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Judge.

The judgment of affirmance is withdrawn and the following substituted therefor.

The State sought to charge appellant by complaint and information with violating articles 1105 and 1106 of Vernon's Ann.Tex. P.C., which regulates the sale of motor fuel. The part of article 1105 applicable to this case provides: "No person * * * shall * * * expose for sale * * * as gasoline or motor fuel, any substance, liquid, or product of petroleum which falls below the standard of gasoline or motor fuel, the minimum requirement of which such standard shall be determined by the following distillation range: * * * 4. The end or dry point of distillation must not be over 437 degrees Fahrenheit. 5. The residue shall not exceed two (2) per cent." Article 1106 excepts gasoline sold from pumps labeled "Inferior Motor Fuel." Article 1111, Vernon's Ann.Tex. P.C., provides that any person who shall "knowingly" violate any of the provisions of articles 1105 or 1106 shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and fixes the punishment. On January 27, 1936, a complaint was made against appellant which only averred that on the 5th day of July, 1935, he "did * * * unlawfully expose for sale as gasoline and motor fuel a substance, below the standard of gasoline and motor fuel, as required by law. * * *" We set out the charging part of the information which was filed on said complaint, italicizing that portion which is not found in the complaint: "* * * Did on or about the 5th day of July, A. D. 1936, unlawfully and knowingly expose for sale as gasoline and motor fuel a substance, liquid and product of petroleum which was below the standard of gasoline and motor fuel, as provided by law, in that the end and dry point of distillation of said substance, liquid and product of petroleum was then and there over 437 degrees Fahrenheit; and said substance, liquid and product of petroleum was then and there intended for use as motor fuel and gasoline and exposed for sale in a filling station pump accessible to the motoring public and gasoline pump was not then and there labeled in plain legible lettering in the English language in the full view of the public with the words `Inferior Motor Fuel',...

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • State v. Pierce
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • September 25, 1991
    ...v. State, 623 S.W.2d 651, 652 (Tex.Cr.App.1981). Without a valid complaint, the information is worthless. Williams v. State, 133 Tex.Crim. 39, 107 S.W.2d 996, 977 (1937). A jurat is the certificate of the officer before whom the complaint is made stating that it was sworn to and subscribed ......
  • State v. Caves
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • June 8, 2016
    ...victim. Id. at 1013. Thus, the complaint failed to charge the offense of aggravated assault. Id.Likewise, in Williams v. State, 133 Tex.Crim. 39, 40, 107 S.W.2d 996, 997 (1937), the defendant claimed the complaint was inadequate because it alleged no offense and failed to support the inform......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT