Willis v. State

Decision Date28 April 1965
Docket NumberNo. 38202,38202
Citation389 S.W.2d 464
PartiesJohnnie WILLIS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.
CourtTexas Court of Criminal Appeals

Richard D. Bird, Childress, for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.

DICE, Commissioner.

Appellant was convicted of unlawfully selling beer in a dry area and his punishment was assessed at six months in jaik and a fine of $500.

The state does not seek an affirmance of the conviction, because it is shown by bill of exception #2 that appellant did not enter a plea in the case. Such position is well taken, as a plea is necessary in every criminal case and where none is entered the trial is a nullity. See: Lumsden v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 384 S.W.2d 143, and cases therein cited.

An affirmance is also not sought for the further reason that bill of exception #3 shows that the complaint was not sworn to by the complainant. This position is also well taken, as a complaint which is not sworn to will not support a prosecution by information. Art. 415, Vernon's Ann.C.C. P.; Colbert v. State, 166 Tex.Cr.R. 431, 314 S.W.2d 602; Purcell v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 317 S.W.2d 208.

The judgment is reversed and the prosecution is ordered dismissed.

Opinion approved by the court.

To continue reading

Request your trial
10 cases
  • State v. Wester
    • United States
    • North Dakota Supreme Court
    • January 31, 1973
    ...Snively, 11 Ill.App.2d 579, 138 N.E.2d 112 (1956); Lumsden v. State, 384 S.W.2d 143 (Tex.Cr.App.1964), rule affirmed in Willis v. State, 389 S.W.2d 464 (Tex.Cr.App.1965); and People v. Sturdy, 235 Cal.App.2d 306, 45 Cal.Rptr. 203 at 206, 207 In Chesnut, defense counsel drew to the attention......
  • State v. Parker, 282
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of New Mexico
    • June 20, 1969
    ...be arraigned, and some jurisdictions hold a conviction must be reversed if the record fails to show an arraignment. Willis v. State, 389 S.W.2d 464 (Tex.Cr.App.1965); State ex rel. Burkhamer v. Adams, 143 W.Va. 557, 103 S.E.2d 777 (1958). This is in accord with the view taken by our Territo......
  • State v. Winters, 15354
    • United States
    • South Dakota Supreme Court
    • July 8, 1987
    ...is no issue for the jury or the Court." Id., 384 S.W.2d at 144. Collateral support for this ruling may be found in Willis v. State, 389 S.W.2d 464 (Tex.Crim.App.1965) and People v. Sturdy, 235 Cal.App.2d 306, 45 Cal.Rptr. 203 (1965). What is there to try unless a matter is in This defendant......
  • Ford v. State, No. 07-07-0224-CR (Tex. App. 6/24/2008)
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • June 24, 2008
    ...person has neither pleaded guilty to a crime nor been tried for the crime, he has not been convicted of the crime. Willis v. State, 389 S.W.2d 464, 464-65 (Tex.Crim.App. 1965); Lumsden, 384 S.W.2d at Here, the record contains no statutory admonishments from the bench or plea in open court r......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT