Wilson v. Carver, A01A1181.
| Decision Date | 26 October 2001 |
| Docket Number | No. A01A1181.,A01A1181. |
| Citation | 252 Ga. App. 174,555 S.E.2d 848 |
| Parties | WILSON v. CARVER. |
| Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Gary C. Harris, Atlanta, for appellant.
Griner & Mirate, Galen A. Mirate, Ellisa Garrett, Athens, for appellee.
Robert F. Wilson sent an application for discretionary appeal by certified mail to this court on October 5, 2000. The order Wilson sought to appeal, which concerned child support and modification of visitation rights, was entered on September 5, 2000. The application Wilson presented to this court did not include a pauper's affidavit or the prescribed filing fee. Wilson's completed application containing the filing fee was filed on October 10, 2000.
This court dismissed Wilson's application on October 31, 2000. Wilson filed a motion for reconsideration of that dismissal, arguing that extenuating circumstances precluded the timely filing of the application. This court granted the motion for reconsideration of the dismissal and granted the application.
Because this court has no jurisdiction over this matter, we must dismiss the appeal. OCGA § 5-6-4 provides that the costs for applications for appeals filed in the Court of Appeals shall be paid "at the time of the filing of the application." The statute then provides: "The clerk is prohibited from receiving the application for appeal or the brief of the appellant unless the costs have been paid or a sufficient affidavit of indigence is filed or contained in the record." See generally Sorrentino v. Boston Mut. Life Ins. Co., 206 Ga.App. 771, 772(2), 426 S.E.2d 594 (1992).
The mandate of OCGA § 5-6-4 is reiterated in our Court of Appeals Rule 5 which states that the clerk "shall not file any matter unless the costs have been paid or a sufficient pauper's affidavit has been filed." Consistently, Court of Appeals Rule 4 states that "[a] document shall be deemed filed when it is physically delivered to the Clerk's office, with sufficient costs, if applicable...." The second sentence of Court of Appeals Rule 4 elaborates upon the provisions for the filing by registered or certified mail.1
Wilson argues that the failure to file the filing fee does not warrant dismissal because this is not one of the three instances enumerated in OCGA § 5-6-48(b). This argument lacks merit. Here, the completed application was not filed within 30 days of the entry of the order, as required under OCGA § 5-6-35(d), and this court has no jurisdiction of an...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
In re Interest of B.R.F.
...And a party's failure to meet this statutory deadline deprives us of jurisdiction to consider the application. Wilson v. Carver, 252 Ga.App. 174, 555 S.E.2d 848 (2001), overruled in part on other grounds in Gable v. State, 290 Ga. 81, 85, 720 S.E.2d 170 (2011). This Court has long held that......
-
Spurlock v. Department of Human Resources
...expiration of the statutory deadline. Our appellate courts have no jurisdiction over an untimely application. See Wilson v. Carver, 252 Ga.App. 174, 174, 555 S.E.2d 848 (2001). Accordingly, appellee contended that the appeal must be The Court of Appeals has rejected, however, the argument t......
-
Gable v. State
...held that the failure to meet the statutory deadline for filing a discretionary appeal is a jurisdictional defect. See Wilson v. Carver, 252 Ga.App. 174, 174, 555 S.E.2d 848 (2001). See also Spurlock v. Dept. of Human Resources, 286 Ga. 512, 525, 690 S.E.2d 378 (2010) (Nahmias, J., concurri......
-
In re S.M.B., A12A1275.
...failure to meet this statutory deadline deprives us of jurisdiction to consider the application. OCGA § 5–6–35(d), Wilson v. Carver, 252 Ga.App. 174, 555 S.E.2d 848 (2001), overruled in part on other grounds in Gable v. State, 290 Ga. 81, 85, 720 S.E.2d 170 (2011). Moreover, we have also he......
-
Workers' Compensation - H. Michael Bagley, Daniel C. Kniffen, Katherine D. Dixon, and Marion H. Martin
...Ga. App. 483, 555 S.E.2d 845 (2001). 245. O.C.G.A. Sec. 34-9-2(a) (1998). 246. 252 Ga. App. at 483, 555 S.E.2d at 846. 247. Id. at 486, 555 S.E.2d at 848. 248. Id. at 484, 555 S.E.2d at 846-47 (citing Yoho v. Ringier of Am., Inc. 263 Ga. 338, 339-41, 434 S.E.2d 57, 59-60 (1993)). 249. O.C.G......
-
Construction Law - Dennis J. Webb, Jr., Justin S. Scott, and Henry L. Balkcom Iv
...& Supp. 2001). 160. 252 Ga. App. at 484, 555 S.E.2d at 847. 161. Id. 162. Id. 163. Id. 164. Id. at 485, 555 S.E.2d at 847. 165. Id., 555 S.E.2d at 848 (citations omitted). 166. Id. at 485-86, 555 S.E.2d at 848. 167. Id. at 486, 555 S.E.2d at 848. 168. 275 Ga. 420, 568 S.E.2d 474 (2002). 169......