Wilson v. Georgia Power Co.

Citation128 Ga.App. 352,196 S.E.2d 693
Decision Date07 February 1973
Docket NumberNos. 47767,47768,No. 3,s. 47767,3
PartiesWillie WILSON v. GEORGIA POWER COMPANY. Queen DANIELS v. GEORGIA POWER COMPANY
CourtUnited States Court of Appeals (Georgia)

Lanier, Powell, Cooper & Cooper, Jack L. Cooper, Augusta, for appellants.

Richard W. Best, Atlanta, for appellee.

Syllabus Opinion by the Court

STOLZ, Judge.

These companion cases are appeals by an employee of Georgia Power Company, Wilson, and the widow of a fellow employee, Daniels, from the Superior Court of Sumter County's judgment reversing the award of the State Board of Workmen's Compensation in favor of both claimants. The evidence shows that both Wilson and Daniels regularly lived in Wadley, Jefferson County, Georgia; that they were employed by Georgia Power Company as members of a traveling construction crew that the power company kept together and moved around the state as its needs required; that the members of the traveling construction crew were required to stay close enough to each job site to report for work each morning; that, because of the distance involved, it was impractical for members of the traveling construction crew to reside in their respective homes each evening after work; that Georgia Power Company paid members of the traveling construction crew who had been its employees a certain length of time a weekly allowance to defray room and board expenses, which Daniels was receiving but Wilson was not; that on the day of the accident, the traveling construction crew completed certain work in Thomaston, Upson County, and were instructed to report to a job site in Americus, Sumter County, the next day at 8:00 o'clock a.m.; that, while Wilson and Daniels were traveling on a direct route from Thomaston to previously secured lodgings of their own choosing in Americus, the automobile accident occurred, causing Daniels's death and Wilson's injury. Held:

1. This case is controlled, with respect to the issue of the accident's arising out of and in the course of employment, by the case of McDonald v. State Hwy. Dept., 127 Ga.App. 171, 192 S.E.2d 919, and cases therein cited. The evidence shows that the employees here, as in the cases of McDonald and those cited therein, were required by their employment to lodge and work within an area geographically limited by the necessity of being available for work on the employer's job site, hence were, in effect, in continuous employment, day and night, for the purposes of the Workmen's Compensation Act. The full quotation from Railway Express Agency v. Shuttleworth, 61 Ga.App. 644(1b), 7 S.E.2d 195, partially quoted in McDonald, supra, 127 Ga.App. p. 176, 192 S.E.2d p. 924, includes 'exposure to the perils of the highway . . .' etc. (Emphasis supplied.) Although the fact that the employer paid for the employees'...

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • Frett v. State Farm Emp. Workers' Comp.
    • United States
    • United States Court of Appeals (Georgia)
    • November 2, 2018
    ...Bell Constr. Co. v. King , 281 Ga. 853, 855, 642 S.E.2d 841 (2007) (citations and punctuation omitted). See Wilson v. Ga. Power Co. , 128 Ga. App. 352, 353-354 (1), 196 S.E.2d 693 (1973). "He must of necessity eat and sleep in various places in order to further the business of his employer[......
  • Ray Bell Const. Co. v. King
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Georgia
    • March 26, 2007
    ...an area geographically limited by the necessity of being available for work on the employer's job site." Wilson v. Georgia Power Co., 128 Ga.App. 352(1), 196 S.E.2d 693 (1973). See also U.S.F. & G. Co. v. Navarre, 147 Ga.App. 302, 304-305, 248 S.E.2d 562 (1978). Such an employee is, "in eff......
  • Barge v. City of College Park
    • United States
    • United States Court of Appeals (Georgia)
    • December 19, 1978
    ...away from home. See in this connection such cases as McDonald v. State Hwy. Dept., 127 Ga.App. 171, 192 S.E.2d 919; Wilson v. Ga. Power Co., 128 Ga.App. 352, 196 S.E.2d 693; General Fire & etc., Co. v. Bellflower, 123 Ga.App. 864, 867(3), 182 S.E.2d 678; New Amsterdam Cas. Co. v. Sumrell, 3......
  • Ray Bell Construction Company v. King
    • United States
    • United States Court of Appeals (Georgia)
    • January 5, 2006
    ...to lodge and work within an area geographically limited by the necessity of being available for work on the employer's job site." Wilson v. Ga. Power Co.3 on the evidence, the Board found this to be the "Fayetteville/Jackson area." The continuous employment doctrine applies to traveling emp......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • Workers' Compensation - H. Michael Bagley, Daniel C. Kniffen, and Katherine D. Dixon
    • United States
    • Mercer University School of Law Mercer Law Reviews No. 58-1, September 2006
    • Invalid date
    ...cert. granted. 184. Id. at 145, 625 S.E.2d at 542. 185. Id. at 146, 625 S.E.2d at 542. 186. Id. (quoting Wilson v. Ga. Power Co., 128 Ga. App. 352, 353-54, 196 S.E.2d 693, 694 (1973)) (brackets in original). 187. Id. at 148, 625 S.E.2d at 544. 188. Id. 189. Id. at 147, 625 S.E.2d at 543. 19......
  • Construction Law - Dana R. Grantham, David L. Hobson, and David J. Mura, Jr.
    • United States
    • Mercer University School of Law Mercer Law Reviews No. 59-1, September 2007
    • Invalid date
    ...Sec. 34-9-1 to -421 (2004 & Supp. 2007). 68. Ray Bell Constr., 281 Ga. at 855, 642 S.E.2d at 844 (quoting Wilson v. Ga. Power Co., 128 Ga. App. 352, 354, 196 S.E.2d 693, 694 (1973)). 69. Id. at 856, 642 S.E.2d at 844 (citing Thornton v. Hartford Accident & Indem. Co., 198 Ga. 786, 790, 32 S......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT