Wilson v. Lee Memorial Hospital

Citation65 So.2d 40
PartiesWILSON v. LEE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL.
Decision Date21 April 1953
CourtUnited States State Supreme Court of Florida

Robert C. Lane, Miami, for appellants.

Richard W. Ervin, Atty. Gen., and John C. Reed, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellees.

SEBRING, Justice.

The Florida State Racing Commission promulgated Rule 460-A which provided:

'Every person holding a permit to conduct pari-mutuel wagering in this State and every person who is a member of an association holding such a permit and every person who is an officer or director of a corporation which holds such a permit, and every employee of the holder of any such permit in any capacity connected to any extent with the pari-mutuel wagering business in this State, and all trainers, jockeys, apprentices, grooms, exercise boys, managers, agents, jai-alai players, bell boys, blacksmiths, veterinarians, and like persons who actively participate in the racing or jai-alai activities of any such permit holders, shall furnish the State Racing Commission, for its files, held fingerprints and photograph, which fingerprints and photograph shall be taken at such times and places and in such manner as the State Racing Commission may from time to time direct and prescribe.' (Emphasis supplied.)

The appellants, who are horse trainers employed by owners of racehorses that race on Florida tracks, have questioned, by their bill for injunction, the lawful right of the Commission to promulgate the quoted rule and to require them to come under its terms as a condition precedent to the issuance of an occupational license by the Commission under section 550.10, Florida Statutes 1951, F.S.A., to act as horse trainers at and around the horse race tracks in Florida.

Section 550.02(4), Florida Statutes 1951, F.S.A., provides that the State Racing Commission shall make rules and regulations 'for the control, supervision and direction of all applicants, permittees and licensees, and for the holding, conducting and operating of all race tracks, race meets or races held in this state; provided, such rules and regulations shall be uniform in their application and effect, and the duty of exercising this control and power is made mandatory upon such commission.'

We are of the view that the authority conferred upon the commission to make rules and regulations 'for the holding, conducting and operating of all race tracks, race meets or races held in this state,' is broad enough to sustain the rule under attack.

The appellants 'are engaged in a business which would be unlawful had not the Legislature seen fit to legalize it under certain conditions and to supervise its operations by a State Commission. What [they] are seeking in this case is to secure what they deem proper protection for what is more in the nature of a privilege than a vested right.' State ex rel. Mason v. Rose, 122 Fla. 413, 165 So. 347, 349.

The...

To continue reading

Request your trial
17 cases
  • Insinga v. LaBella
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • April 20, 1989
    ...contractor such as a physician in private practice to whom it has merely granted staff privileges." See also, Wilson v. Lee Memorial Hospital, 65 So.2d 40 (Fla.1953). The court distinguished the instant case from Beam v. University Hospital Building, Inc., 486 So.2d 672 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.198......
  • Stone v. Palms West Hosp., 4D05-4042.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • November 8, 2006
    ...for the negligence of an independent contractor. We, therefore, hold, in accord with the Supreme Court case of Wilson v. Lee Memorial Hospital, 65 So.2d 40 (Fla. 1953), and our own Irving case, supra, that under the facts presented here, the hospital is not vicariously liable for the tortio......
  • Insinga v. LaBella
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit
    • April 21, 1988
    ...contractor such as a physician in private practice to whom it has merely granted staff privileges." See also, Wilson v. Lee Memorial Hospital, 65 So.2d 40 (Fla.1953). The court distinguished the instant case from Beam v. University Hospital Building, Inc., 486 So.2d 672 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.198......
  • Nardone v. Reynolds
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • September 17, 1976
    ...employees or for its own direct failure to disclose. See Bourgeois v. Dade County, Fla., 1956, 99 So.2d 575, 577; Wilson v. Lee Memorial Hospital, Fla., 1953, 65 So.2d 40, 41.15 One consideration bearing on the decision by the trier of fact as to the duty to disclose known conditions/causes......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Nursing in Florida: the path to professional liability.
    • United States
    • Florida Bar Journal Vol. 70 No. 3, March 1996
    • March 1, 1996
    ...supra note 1 (the author discusses at length the evolution of the American hospital system). [10] See, e.g., Wilson v. Lee Memorial Hosp., 65 So. 2d 40 (Fla. [11] Carmen D. Rasmussen, Hospital Liability Related to Understaffing of Nursing Services: Walking the Fine Line Between Respondeat S......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT