Wilson v. State, 45690
| Decision Date | 27 November 1974 |
| Docket Number | No. 45690,45690 |
| Citation | 304 So.2d 119 |
| Parties | Dennis Wayne WILSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida Supreme Court |
Warner S. Olds, Public Defender and William W. Herring, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., C. Marie Bernard and Robert B. Breisblatt, Asst. Attys. Gen., for appellee.
Appellant stands before us on direct appeal from a jury trial for first degree murder in which he was convicted and adjudicated guilty of second degree murder. His attack is two-pronged: (1) by attacking the trial judge's denial of his motion to suppress a confession without a specific finding on voluntariness, and (2) by attacking vel non (and as applied) the trial judge's ruling upholding the constitutionality of § 913.08(1)(a), F.S., and F.R.Cr.P. 3.350(a). Appellant contends that the act and rule constituted a denial of due process and equal protection of law by failing to give him, an accused charged with a capital felony, any more peremptory challenges than those given to one charged with a felony punishable by life imprisonment.
We have jurisdiction pursuant to Art. V, § 3(b)(1), Florida Constitution, and accordingly, after hearing oral arguments and upon review of the briefs and record, we affirm.
Appellant's disagreement with the trial judge's lack of a specific ruling and finding on the voluntariness of his confession is without merit for the following reason.
A hearing was obviously held upon the admissibility of the confession. Lt. O'Connor, who had taken appellant's statement, testified that appellant's 'warning-rights' were read verbatim to him from the waiver form and that he answered 'yes' to the question 'do you understand' and initialed each question and added that he was permitted to read the rights waiver form. The waiver form was signed at the top and bottom by Lt. O'Connor. It was admitted into evidence and Lt. O'Connor identified the appellant as having signed it.
Appellant also admitted that no request of his for comfort (coffee--cigarettes--use of bathroom, etc.) was refused; that the room was well lighted; and that Lt. O'Connor tried to make him as comfortable as possible.
Noteworthy was an additional statement contained in the 'waiver' form, reading as follows:
While it is true that the State must show by a preponderance of the evidence that a confession was voluntary (Dodd v. State, Fla.App.1970, 232 So.2d 235; State v. Stone, Fla.App.1973, 279 So.2d 351; State v. Harris, Fla.App.1973, 276 So.2d 845; Smith v. State, Fla.App.1974, 288 So.2d 522; and McDole v. State, Fla.1973, 283 So.2d 553), nevertheless, there are many instances in an evidentiary hearing where certain apparent impervious occasions arise. Wisdom and reasoning must then be applied in resolving the ultimate conclusion to be drawn from the given set of facts. Apropos is the problem sub judice which is subject to objective probity in our review.
The clear and uncontradicted testimony of Lt. O'Connor together with the documentary evidence, remained uncontroverted. No contention or attempt was made or proffered to espouse a theory of coercion, brutality or involuntariness.
In this posture, we still adhere to our position in McDole, supra, at 554 acknowledging, however, a major distinguishing feature. Therein, we stated:
and, in McDole, we went into great detail to describe the brutalities inflicted upon the persons involved....
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
State v. DeConingh
...police procedure which caused the confession to be involuntary. See, e. g., Palmes v. State, 397 So.2d 648 (Fla.1981); Wilson v. State, 304 So.2d 119 (Fla.1974); McDole v. State, 283 So.2d 553 (Fla.1973); State v. Beck, 390 So.2d 748 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); State v. Williams, 386 So.2d 27 (Fla.......
-
Peterson v. State
...the requirement that the trial judge make the initial determination of voluntariness is met. Moreover, in the later case of Wilson v. State, 304 So.2d 119 (Fla.1974), a case similar to McDole, but without allegations of coercion, our supreme court found denial of a motion to suppress to be ......
-
Dodge v. State
...court's findings can be ascertained from the record, that is sufficient. This view has been persuasive in other courts. Wilson v. State, Fla.1974, 304 So.2d 119, 120; State v. Erving, 1966, 180 Neb. 824, 146 N.W.2d 216, cert. den. 386 U.S. 998, 87 S.Ct. 1320, 18 L.Ed.2d 348; Wade v. Yeager,......
-
Antone v. State
...(Fla.1973). This Court, however, has modified the strict requirement that an express finding must appear in the record. See Wilson v. State, 304 So.2d 119 (Fla.1974); Henry v. State, 328 So.2d 430, 431 n.1, (Fla.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 951, 97 S.Ct. 370, 50 L.Ed.2d 319 (1976). 3 Ideally, ......