Wilson v. Wilson
Decision Date | 02 May 1978 |
Docket Number | No. 33468,33468 |
Citation | 245 S.E.2d 279,241 Ga. 305 |
Parties | WILSON v. WILSON. |
Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
Trauner, King & Cohen, Stanton J. Shapiro, Atlanta, for appellant.
Joseph E. Wilkerson, Atlanta, for appellee.
Robinson v. Ashmore, 232 Ga. 498, 500, 207 S.E.2d 484, 486 (1974).
In the case sub judice, the mother, who had custody of the parties' minor children pursuant to the divorce decree, had voluntarily relinquished the actual custody of the children to the father for a period of time. The appellant father, who seeks to have custody changed to him, contends that this voluntary relinquishment constituted a changed condition affecting the welfare of the children which warrants the change of custody. While this factor may authorize a change in custody in some situations (e. g., Wilt v. Wilt, 229 Ga. 658, 193 S.E.2d 833 (1972); Walker v. Steele, 206 Ga. 674, 58 S.E.2d 421 (1950)), in the present case it appears that the relinquishment was temporary, during a period of time in which the mother was required by her employment to do extensive traveling, that this condition no longer exists, and that the children are back in her physical custody again.
Additionally, the trial judge found that, although both parties were good parents, the father's present wife has a child, with whom there have been some conflicts with the children in question; that the mother has made adequate provisions for the children while she is working; and that the children seem to be happy living with her and are doing well in the neighborhood school which is in close proximity to the mother's residence.
The evidence authorized the denial of the petition for change of child custody.
Judgment affirmed.
All the Justices concur.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Scott v. Scott, S02A1909.
...warrant a change in custody is a fact question determined under the unique situation in each individual case. Wilson v. Wilson, 241 Ga. 305, 245 S.E.2d 279 (1978). In contemplating a custodial change, the trial court must exercise its discretion to determine whether a change is in the best ......
-
Neal v. Hibbard
...warrant a change in custody is a fact question determined under the unique situation in each individual case. Wilson v. Wilson, 241 Ga. 305, 245 S.E.2d 279 (1978). In contemplating a custodial change, the trial court must exercise its discretion to determine whether a change is in the best ......
-
Porter v. Johnson
...not constitute acquiescence to Permanent custody in the father, so as to amount to abandonment as a matter of law. See Wilson v. Wilson, 241 Ga. 305, 245 S.E.2d 279 (1978); Blood v. Earnest, 217 Ga. 642, 123 S.E.2d 913 (1962). The evidence to the effect that the plaintiff's whereabouts was ......
- Wilkinson v. Wilkinson, 33458