Wing v. JMB Property Management Corp., 84CA1187
| Decision Date | 05 December 1985 |
| Docket Number | No. 84CA1187,84CA1187 |
| Citation | 714 P.2d 916 |
| Parties | 48 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 111 Grace A. WING, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JMB PROPERTY MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, an Illinois corporation licensed to do business in the State of Colorado; Steve Duerkop, individually and as agent for JMB Property Management Corporation; Larry Beasley, individually and as agent for JMB Property Management Corporation; H.D. Aylsworth, individually and as agent for JMB Property Management Corporation, Defendants-Appellees. . I |
| Court | Colorado Court of Appeals |
Devitt & Weiszmann, Jerald J. Devitt, Golden, for plaintiff-appellant.
Mayer, Brown & Platt, Kevin L. Shaw, Thomas P. Johnson, Denver, for defendants-appellees.
Plaintiff, Grace A. Wing (Wing), appeals from the trial court's dismissal of all of her claims against her employer JMB Property Management Corporation (JMB), and three other defendants who were employees of JMB. The motion to dismiss under C.R.C.P. 12(b) was filed shortly after the filing of the complaint. We affirm in part, and reverse in part.
Wing's complaint stems from termination of her employment as property manager for apartments managed by JMB. Wing's first claim for relief alleges that JMB operated under a personnel manual; that JMB required its employees to comply with this manual; that Wing justifiably relied upon the provisions and procedures stated in the manual; and, that, therefore, defendants breached her implied contract of employment in that her termination was not effected in accordance with the manual. There is no dispute that Wing had no written employment contract with defendants.
In her second claim for relief, Wing seeks recovery on a tort theory of negligent termination of employment. In her third claim for relief, Wing recites several incidents of sexual harassment and alleges that as a result of defendants' actions, she was ridiculed, threatened, humiliated, and fired. Wing therefore alleges outrageous conduct based upon sexual harassment. Wing's fourth claim for relief seeks punitive damages based on the wanton, willful, intentional, malicious actions of the defendants.
The trial court dismissed Wing's first claim for relief on the basis that Wing had failed to allege facts which overcame the presumption that she was an at-will employee. As to Wing's second claim for relief, the trial court ruled that there is no actionable claim in Colorado for negligent termination of employment. The third claim was dismissed because Wing had failed to exhaust her administrative remedies before the Colorado Civil Rights Commission pursuant to §§ 24-34-301, et seq., C.R.S. Finally, the trial court ruled that the claim for punitive damages was rendered moot because Wing could not prevail on any of the other three claims. We agree with the trial court's rulings only as to Wing's claim for negligent termination.
In support of her claim for negligent termination, Wing relies primarily on Brooks v. Trans World Airlines, Inc., 574 F.Supp. 805 (D.Colo.1983), which cites Lampe v. Presbyterian Medical Center, 41 Colo.App. 465, 590 P.2d 513 (1978), and states that: "Colorado has ... a tort of wrongful discharge under limited circumstances." In addition, Wing claims that under Salimi v. Farmers Insurance Group, 684 P.2d 264 (Colo.App.1984), a duty exists between an employer and employee where personnel policies exist. We disagree that such a tort or such a non-contractual duty exists.
Lampe discusses exceptions to the common-law rule of employment at will which exist if an employee is discharged for exercising a statutory right or duty. These exceptions, however, pertain to the law of contracts, and do not provide actionable claims in tort. Similarly, Salimi v. Farmers Insurance Group, supra, concerns only a contractual duty.
The exceptions discussed in Lampe are not applicable to the allegations made by Wing, and she alleges only failure to perform a contractual obligation. Therefore, the trial court properly dismissed her tort claim of negligent termination for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. C.R.C.P. 12(b)(5).
As to Wing's first claim premised on breach of an implied contract, we note that an employer may become contractually bound as a result of an implied contract in a personnel manual or an employer's specific policies. Brooks v. Trans World Airlines, Inc., supra; Salimi v. Farmers Insurance Group, supra. Accordingly, the allegations of Wing's first claim are sufficient to state a claim for relief. See Salimi v. Farmers...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Price v. Federal Exp. Corp.
...conduct has been recognized in the employment context in a number of circumstances: sexual harassment, Wing v. J.M.B. Property Management, Corp., 714 P.2d 916 (Colo.App.1985); firing waitresses in alphabetical order, Agis v. Howard Johnson Co., 371 Mass. 140, 355 N.E.2d 315 (1976); construc......
-
Vaske v. DuCharme, McMillen & Associates, Inc.
...plaintiff in Bradbury however had been chased and strangled by agents of the defendants. Id. at 1359. In Wing v. JMB Property Management Corp., 714 P.2d 916, 918 (Colo.App. 1988), the Colorado Court of Appeals reversed a trial court's decision to dismiss an employee's claim for outrageous c......
-
Mares v. Conagra Poultry Co., Inc.
...jury. The plaintiff in Bradbury had been chased and strangled by agents of the defendants. Id. at 1359. In Wing v. JMB Property Management Corp., 714 P.2d 916, 918 (Colo.App. 1985), the Colorado Court of Appeals reversed a trial court's decision to dismiss an employee's claim for outrageous......
-
Bellairs v. Coors Brewing Co., Civ. A. No. 94-B-1405.
...5). I conclude, as a matter of law, that the manner of Bellairs' discharge was not outrageous. Compare Wing v. JMB Property Management Corp., 714 P.2d 916, 918 (Colo.App.1985) (plaintiff was assaulted, thrown to the ground, sexually harassed, ridiculed, threatened, humiliated and ultimately......
-
A Survey of Outrageous Conduct Under Colorado Law: Part Ii
...of facts in support of her outrageous conduct claim that will entitle her to relief." Id. at 633. Wing v. JMB Property Management Corp., 714 P.2d 916 (Colo.App. Plaintiff's "complaint stems from termination of her employment . . . by [the defendant employer]." Id. at 917. Plaintiff "recites......
-
Nonexclusivity of Statutory Remedies for Employment Discrimination: Brooke v. Restaurant Services, Inc
...P.2d 1310, 1315 (Colo. 1982). 16. 695 P.2d 311, 313 (Colo.App. 1984), quoting Red Seal Potato Chip Co., 618 P.2d 697 (Colo.App. 1980). 17. 714 P.2d 916 (Colo.App. 1985). 18. Id. at 918-19. 19. 881 P.2d 409 (Colo.App. 1994), rev'd, 906 P.2d 66 (Colo. 1995). 20. Brooke v. Restaurant Services,......
-
Practicing Before the Colorado Civil Rights Commission
...and 24-34-306(8). 31. Continental Title Co. v. District Court, 645 P.2d 1310 (Colo. 1982); Wing v. J.M.B. Property Management, 714 P.2d 916 (Colo.App. 1985). See also, CRS § 24-34-306(11). 32. See, Agnello, supra, note 15; Continental Title, supra, note 31. 33. CRS §§ 24-4-106(11)(b) and 24......
-
Fraud and Negligent Misrepresentation Tort Theories and Employment Law
...employees, and their respective counsel should factor into their calculus the potential for tort liability in employment law. NOTES 1. 714 P.2d 916 (Colo.App. 1985). 2. 12 Individual Employee Rights ("IER")13 (Colo.App. 1996). 3. Trimble v. City and County of Denver, 697 P.2d 716 (Colo. 198......