Winn Dixie Stores, Inc. v. Danielsen, 89-0418

Decision Date07 June 1989
Docket NumberNo. 89-0418,89-0418
Citation14 Fla. L. Weekly 1381,544 So.2d 320
Parties14 Fla. L. Weekly 1381 WINN DIXIE STORES, INC., Appellant, v. Alice DANIELSEN, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Larry Klein and Barbara J. Compiani of Klein, Beranek & Walsh, P.A., West Palm Beach, and Solomon & Murphy, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Douglas M. Bates, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal of a non-final order denying a motion for rehearing and denying a motion to vacate a default. We reverse.

The defendant/appellant, Winn Dixie, established by affidavits that the default was due to secretarial error constituting excusable neglect; that meritorious defenses exist as set forth in the answer to the complaint; and that Winn Dixie showed due diligence in seeking relief on the same day the default was discovered. Therefore the trial court's refusal to set aside the default constituted an abuse of discretion. Broward County v. Perdue, 432 So.2d 742 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983).

REVERSED AND REMANDED for further proceedings consistent herewith.

HERSEY, C.J., and DOWNEY and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Roso v. Henning, 19934
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of South Dakota
    • 4 juin 1997
    ...prejudice to prevailing party as one of three factors in setting aside default judgment); Winn Dixie Stores, Inc. v. Danielsen, 544 So.2d 320, 320 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1989)(considering due diligence as factor when relief is sought from default judgment); Flower v. Maryliz Food & Drink Corp., 1......
  • Smith v. Hermsen
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of South Dakota
    • 10 septembre 1997
    ...(discussing prejudice to prevailing party as one of three factors in setting aside default judgment); Winn Dixie Stores, Inc. v. Danielsen, 544 So.2d 320, 320 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1989) (considering due diligence as factor when relief is sought from default judgment); Flower v. Maryliz Food & D......
  • Preferred Mut. Ins. Co. v. Davis, 92-3300
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Florida (US)
    • 15 décembre 1993
    ...reasonable misunderstanding, a system gone awry or any other of the foibles to which human nature is heir"); Winn Dixie Stores v. Danielsen, 544 So.2d 320 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989) (failure to file answer due to secretarial error was excused, given that there was "due diligence in seeking relief ......
  • Wendell v. Wilshire Corp., 1
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Florida (US)
    • 7 juin 1989
    ...... in Bankruptcy for Palm Springs Village Green, Inc., No. 1, Bankrupt, Appellants,. v. WILSHIRE ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT